Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Serverless Development Frameworks

Apache OpenWhisk vs OpenFaaS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Apache OpenWhisk #3 in Serverless Development Frameworks 8.8/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 4 features Try Apache OpenWhisk
OpenFaaS #6 in Serverless Development Frameworks 8.4/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit OpenFaaS

Apache OpenWhisk leads on 0 checks, OpenFaaS on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache OpenWhisk · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly OpenFaaS
  • Free trialonly OpenFaaS

Apache OpenWhisk scores higher on our rubric for serverless development frameworks: 8.8 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

Apache OpenWhisk is the better fit for teams building portable event-driven functions. OpenFaaS is the better fit for teams deploying containerized functions on Kubernetes.

  • Apache OpenWhisk fits best

    Teams building portable event-driven functions

  • OpenFaaS fits best

    Teams deploying containerized functions on Kubernetes

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache OpenWhisk 8.8/10 Visit ↗ OpenFaaS 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.4
Ranking #3 in Serverless Development Frameworks #6 in Serverless Development Frameworks
Best for Teams building portable event-driven functions Teams deploying containerized functions on Kubernetes
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Open source $1,250/mo
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Desktop, Self-hosted Cloud, Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Linux, macOS, Windows Web, Linux
Integrations 7 integrations 11 integrations
Features Apache OpenWhisk 0/4 · OpenFaaS 0/4
Local testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Application packaging Not checked yet Not checked yet
Kubernetes support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment rollback Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported languages Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports triggers, rules, feeds, sequences, and synchronous or asynchronous actions
  • Offers multiple language runtimes plus custom Docker runtimes
  • Deploys locally or on Kubernetes and includes REST API access
  • Deploy to Kubernetes, K3s, OpenShift, or a single host with faasd
  • Supports event connectors including Kafka, RabbitMQ, and PostgreSQL
  • Offers language templates plus custom container images and runtimes
Cons
  • Requires a self-managed deployment rather than a vendor-hosted paid service
  • Management and deployment workflows center on the CLI and YAML manifests
  • The published product details give limited development and deployment workflow guidance
  • Community Edition limits deployments to 15 functions and one namespace
  • Private function registries and scale-to-zero require a paid plan
  • Standard starts at $1,250 per month
Our verdict

Apache OpenWhisk is an open-source, distributed serverless platform for running functions in response to events or HTTP requests. Its model combines actions with triggers, rules, feeds, packages, and sequences, making it a fit for teams…

Read the review →

OpenFaaS is a self-hosted serverless platform for teams deploying event-driven functions and microservices as OCI container images. It targets Kubernetes, K3s, OpenShift, and single-host deployments with faasd, and is designed for cloud,…

Read the review →
  1. Apache OpenWhiskServerless Development Frameworks 8.8Open source
  2. OpenFaaSServerless Development Frameworks 8.4Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache OpenWhisk — where it wins

    • Supports triggers, rules, feeds, sequences, and synchronous or asynchronous actions
    • Offers multiple language runtimes plus custom Docker runtimes
    • Deploys locally or on Kubernetes and includes REST API access

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a self-managed deployment rather than a vendor-hosted paid service
    • Management and deployment workflows center on the CLI and YAML manifests
    • The published product details give limited development and deployment workflow guidance
  • OpenFaaS — where it wins

    • Deploy to Kubernetes, K3s, OpenShift, or a single host with faasd
    • Supports event connectors including Kafka, RabbitMQ, and PostgreSQL
    • Offers language templates plus custom container images and runtimes

    Where it doesn't

    • Community Edition limits deployments to 15 functions and one namespace
    • Private function registries and scale-to-zero require a paid plan
    • Standard starts at $1,250 per month
  • Apache OpenWhisk8.8/10 · Open source

    A portable, self-managed framework for event-driven functions, with Kubernetes and Docker support.

    Try Apache OpenWhiskFull verdict →
  • OpenFaaS8.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A self-hosted, container-based serverless platform with broad Kubernetes targets and paid scale-to-zero.

    Visit OpenFaaSFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update