Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Internet Archiving Software

MirrorWeb Web Archiving vs Pagefreezer

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
Higher score MirrorWeb Web Archiving #3 in Internet Archiving Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit MirrorWeb
Pagefreezer #4 in Internet Archiving Software 8.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Pagefreezer

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMirrorWeb Web Archiving · 8.6/10

MirrorWeb Web Archiving scores higher on our rubric for internet archiving software: 8.6 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

MirrorWeb Web Archiving is the better fit for organizations preserving websites and communications. Pagefreezer is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise legal and compliance teams.

  • MirrorWeb Web Archiving fits best

    Organizations preserving websites and communications

  • Pagefreezer fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise legal and compliance teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature MirrorWeb Web Archiving 8.6/10 Visit ↗ Pagefreezer 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.6 8.4
Ranking #3 in Internet Archiving Software #4 in Internet Archiving Software
Best for Organizations preserving websites and communications Mid-market and enterprise legal and compliance teams
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features MirrorWeb Web Archiving 0/2 · Pagefreezer 0/2
Scheduled crawls Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Capture scope Not checked yet Not checked yet
Capture frequency Not checked yet Not checked yet
Archive export Not checked yet Not checked yet
Retention period Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Captures dynamic sites, single-page apps and user-specific views
  • Stores immutable WARC records in a WORM environment
  • Combines website archiving with email and collaboration capture
  • Captures websites, social media, texts, and collaboration content in real time
  • Places records, users, conversations, or cases on legal hold
  • Exports records with metadata, timestamps, and SHA-256 signatures
Cons
  • Pricing requires a sales or demo conversation
  • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring on-premises archiving
  • Its broader communications scope may exceed website-only preservation needs
  • Pricing requires a fit review and demo with sales
  • Cloud deployment and web access may not suit every environment
  • Broad compliance archiving may exceed the needs of simpler website archiving
Our verdict

MirrorWeb Web Archiving is a cloud service for organizations that need to preserve websites and communications, including governments, financial firms, brands and regulated organizations. It captures dynamic and interactive pages, then…

Read the review →

Pagefreezer is a cloud software service for capturing, preserving, searching, and exporting digital records. It is aimed at organizations whose legal and compliance teams need to retain evidence from websites, social media, mobile text…

Read the review →
  1. MirrorWeb Web ArchivingInternet Archiving Software 8.6Pricing on request
  2. PagefreezerInternet Archiving Software 8.4Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • MirrorWeb Web Archiving — where it wins

    • Captures dynamic sites, single-page apps and user-specific views
    • Stores immutable WARC records in a WORM environment
    • Combines website archiving with email and collaboration capture

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales or demo conversation
    • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring on-premises archiving
    • Its broader communications scope may exceed website-only preservation needs
  • Pagefreezer — where it wins

    • Captures websites, social media, texts, and collaboration content in real time
    • Places records, users, conversations, or cases on legal hold
    • Exports records with metadata, timestamps, and SHA-256 signatures

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a fit review and demo with sales
    • Cloud deployment and web access may not suit every environment
    • Broad compliance archiving may exceed the needs of simpler website archiving
  • MirrorWeb Web Archiving8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    Preserves dynamic websites and communications with immutable records, search and replay.

    Visit MirrorWebFull verdict →
  • Pagefreezer8.4/10 · Pricing on request

    Real-time archiving with legal holds, audit logs, and signed exports for regulated teams.

    Visit PagefreezerFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update