Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Internet Archiving Software

MirrorWeb Web Archiving vs Heritrix

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score MirrorWeb Web Archiving #3 in Internet Archiving Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit MirrorWeb
Heritrix #6 in Internet Archiving Software 8.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Heritrix

MirrorWeb Web Archiving leads on 0 checks, Heritrix on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMirrorWeb Web Archiving · 8.6/10
  • Free planonly Heritrix
  • Most featuresHeritrix · 1 of 2

MirrorWeb Web Archiving scores higher on our rubric for internet archiving software: 8.6 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

MirrorWeb Web Archiving is the better fit for organizations preserving websites and communications. Heritrix is the better fit for technical teams building configurable crawl workflows.

  • MirrorWeb Web Archiving fits best

    Organizations preserving websites and communications

  • Heritrix fits best

    Technical teams building configurable crawl workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature MirrorWeb Web Archiving 8.6/10 Visit ↗ Heritrix 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.6 8.0
Ranking #3 in Internet Archiving Software #6 in Internet Archiving Software
Best for Organizations preserving websites and communications Technical teams building configurable crawl workflows
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Self-hosted
Platforms Web Linux, Windows
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features MirrorWeb Web Archiving 0/2 · Heritrix 1/2
Scheduled crawls Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Capture scope Not checked yet Website
Capture frequency Not checked yet Not checked yet
Archive export Not checked yet Warc
Retention period Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Captures dynamic sites, single-page apps and user-specific views
  • Stores immutable WARC records in a WORM environment
  • Combines website archiving with email and collaboration capture
  • Set crawl scope, inclusion and exclusion rules, and resource limits
  • Manage jobs through a web interface or REST API
  • Write crawled content with WARC writer components
Cons
  • Pricing requires a sales or demo conversation
  • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring on-premises archiving
  • Its broader communications scope may exceed website-only preservation needs
  • Requires teams to operate their own infrastructure
  • Job configuration and crawl policies require technical oversight
  • Recurring schedules and retention depend on deployment and configuration
Our verdict

MirrorWeb Web Archiving is a cloud service for organizations that need to preserve websites and communications, including governments, financial firms, brands and regulated organizations. It captures dynamic and interactive pages, then…

Read the review →

Heritrix is an open-source web crawler developed by the Internet Archive for archival-quality crawling. It is aimed at technical teams and organizations that operate their own web-archiving infrastructure, rather than buyers seeking a…

Read the review →
  1. MirrorWeb Web ArchivingInternet Archiving Software 8.6Pricing on request
  2. HeritrixInternet Archiving Software 8.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • MirrorWeb Web Archiving — where it wins

    • Captures dynamic sites, single-page apps and user-specific views
    • Stores immutable WARC records in a WORM environment
    • Combines website archiving with email and collaboration capture

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales or demo conversation
    • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring on-premises archiving
    • Its broader communications scope may exceed website-only preservation needs
  • Heritrix — where it wins

    • Set crawl scope, inclusion and exclusion rules, and resource limits
    • Manage jobs through a web interface or REST API
    • Write crawled content with WARC writer components

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires teams to operate their own infrastructure
    • Job configuration and crawl policies require technical oversight
    • Recurring schedules and retention depend on deployment and configuration
  • MirrorWeb Web Archiving8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    Preserves dynamic websites and communications with immutable records, search and replay.

    Visit MirrorWebFull verdict →
  • Heritrix8.0/10 · Free plan

    A configurable crawler for teams operating their own web-archiving infrastructure.

    Visit HeritrixFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update