Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software

MeetingHand Abstract Management vs Oxford Abstracts

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score MeetingHand Abstract Management #5 in Call for Papers Software 7.7/10 Free plan · paid from $4.90 Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit MeetingHand
Oxford Abstracts #8 in Call for Papers Software 7.3/10 Free plan · paid from $890 Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Try Oxford Abstracts

MeetingHand Abstract Management leads on 0 checks, Oxford Abstracts on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMeetingHand Abstract Management · 7.7/10
  • Free planboth

MeetingHand Abstract Management scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 7.7 against 7.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

On submission types, MeetingHand Abstract Management gives you Mixed where Oxford Abstracts offers Abstracts. On review stages, MeetingHand Abstract Management gives you Custom where Oxford Abstracts offers Multi_stage.

MeetingHand Abstract Management is the better fit for small events needing low-cost abstract management. Oxford Abstracts is the better fit for large abstract-led conferences.

  • MeetingHand Abstract Management fits best

    Small events needing low-cost abstract management

  • Oxford Abstracts fits best

    Large abstract-led conferences

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature MeetingHand Abstract Management 7.7/10 Visit ↗ Oxford Abstracts 7.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 7.3
Ranking #5 in Call for Papers Software #8 in Call for Papers Software
Best for Small events needing low-cost abstract management Large abstract-led conferences
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs · 24/7 Email, Tickets, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features MeetingHand Abstract Management 2/2 · Oxford Abstracts 2/2
Blind review ✓ ✓
Schedule builder ✓ ✓
Specs
Submission types Mixed Abstracts
Review stages Custom Multi_stage
Submission limit 25 submissions Not published
Reviewer limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan supports up to 25 registrations or abstracts
  • Blind review, reviewer scoring, decisions, and notifications are included
  • Builds multi-track agendas and exports books of abstracts
  • Unlimited submissions across the listed plans
  • Multi-stage review with blind settings and reviewer assignment
  • Scheduling, registration, abstract books, web access, and API coverage
Cons
  • Free usage is limited to 25 registrations or abstracts
  • Pay-as-you-go costs $4.9 per abstract or registration monthly
  • The product is available through the web platform only
  • Advanced abstract management starts at $890 per event
  • Conference features require the $2,290 per event plan
  • The free Basic package is positioned for small meetings
Our verdict

MeetingHand Abstract Management is a web-based platform for academic and professional event organizers managing submissions and conference programs. It supports customizable abstract and full-text forms, author and co-author data…

Read the review →

Oxford Abstracts is a web-based platform for academic conference organisers managing the full path from abstract submission to event delivery. It supports configurable submission and review forms, reviewer assignment, grading, decisions,…

Read the review →
  1. MeetingHand Abstract ManagementCall for Papers Software 7.7Free plan · paid from $4.90
  2. Oxford AbstractsCall for Papers Software 7.3Free plan · paid from $890

Strengths and trade-offs

  • MeetingHand Abstract Management — where it wins

    • Free plan supports up to 25 registrations or abstracts
    • Blind review, reviewer scoring, decisions, and notifications are included
    • Builds multi-track agendas and exports books of abstracts

    Where it doesn't

    • Free usage is limited to 25 registrations or abstracts
    • Pay-as-you-go costs $4.9 per abstract or registration monthly
    • The product is available through the web platform only
  • Oxford Abstracts — where it wins

    • Unlimited submissions across the listed plans
    • Multi-stage review with blind settings and reviewer assignment
    • Scheduling, registration, abstract books, web access, and API coverage

    Where it doesn't

    • Advanced abstract management starts at $890 per event
    • Conference features require the $2,290 per event plan
    • The free Basic package is positioned for small meetings
  • MeetingHand Abstract Management7.7/10 · Free plan · paid from $4.90

    A low-cost web tool covering submissions, review, scheduling, and abstract-book exports.

    Visit MeetingHandFull verdict →
  • Oxford Abstracts7.3/10 · Free plan · paid from $890

    A flexible abstract and conference workflow with free access and paid event tiers.

    Try Oxford AbstractsFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update