Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Network Protocol Analyzers

Kismet vs CloudShark

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Kismet #4 in Network Protocol Analyzers 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Kismet
CloudShark #16 in Network Protocol Analyzers 7.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit CloudShark

Kismet leads on 1 check, CloudShark on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreKismet · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly Kismet
  • Most featuresKismet · 5 of 5

Kismet scores higher on our rubric for network protocol analyzers: 8.9 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #16.

Kismet offers free plan; CloudShark doesn't. On deployment, Kismet gives you Both where CloudShark offers Server.

Kismet is the better fit for wireless packet capture and monitoring. CloudShark is the better fit for managed enterprise packet analysis.

  • Kismet fits best

    Wireless packet capture and monitoring

  • CloudShark fits best

    Managed enterprise packet analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Kismet 8.9/10 Visit ↗ CloudShark 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 7.6
Ranking #4 in Network Protocol Analyzers #16 in Network Protocol Analyzers
Best for Wireless packet capture and monitoring Managed enterprise packet analysis
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan —
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Kismet 5/5 · CloudShark 3/5
PCAP support ✓ ✓
Traffic decryption ✓ ✓
CLI tools ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Remote capture ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Flow analysis ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Both Server
Capture sources Both Both
Our review
Pros
  • Captures Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee, RF, and supported sensor traffic
  • Supports remote sensors, PCAP workflows, APIs, and command-line tools
  • Combines device tracking, WIDS alerts, logging, and trend monitoring
  • Wireshark-compatible viewing with familiar display filters
  • Deep search, large PCAP processing, and centralized capture analysis
  • Zeek, Suricata, REST API, and enterprise integrations
Cons
  • Windows support runs through WSL rather than a native capture stack
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams focused on one protocol
  • Known-key decryption support depends on having the relevant key
  • No free plan for smaller or exploratory deployments
  • Enterprise pricing requires a sales conversation
  • Self-hosted server deployment requires infrastructure management
Our verdict

Kismet is a free, open-source wireless monitoring and packet-capture tool for teams investigating Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, Zigbee, RF devices, and other supported protocols. It supports local interfaces and remote sensors,…

Read the review →

CloudShark Enterprise is a self-hosted packet-capture analysis platform for network operations, security, and engineering teams. It runs through web and API interfaces, supports PCAP capture sources, and provides a browser-based packet…

Read the review →
  1. KismetNetwork Protocol Analyzers 8.9Free plan
  2. CloudSharkNetwork Protocol Analyzers 7.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Kismet — where it wins

    • Captures Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee, RF, and supported sensor traffic
    • Supports remote sensors, PCAP workflows, APIs, and command-line tools
    • Combines device tracking, WIDS alerts, logging, and trend monitoring

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows support runs through WSL rather than a native capture stack
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams focused on one protocol
    • Known-key decryption support depends on having the relevant key

  • CloudShark — where it wins

    • Wireshark-compatible viewing with familiar display filters
    • Deep search, large PCAP processing, and centralized capture analysis
    • Zeek, Suricata, REST API, and enterprise integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan for smaller or exploratory deployments
    • Enterprise pricing requires a sales conversation
    • Self-hosted server deployment requires infrastructure management
  • Kismet8.9/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, free toolkit for wireless capture, monitoring, analysis, and distributed sensors.

    Visit KismetFull verdict →
  • CloudShark7.6/10 · Pricing on request

    Enterprise packet analysis with Wireshark compatibility, automation, and deep search.

    Visit CloudSharkFull verdict →

More comparisons

All network protocol analyzers comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update