Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Pull Request Automation Tools

Greptile vs Codluma

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Greptile #4 in Pull Request Automation Tools 8.7/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Greptile
Codluma #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools 8.5/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Codluma

Greptile leads on 0 checks, Codluma on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGreptile · 8.7/10
  • Lowest starting priceCodluma · $29/seat/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresCodluma · 4 of 4

Greptile scores higher on our rubric for pull request automation tools: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Codluma is cheaper to start at $29/user/mo against $30/user/mo.

Greptile is the better fit for teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes. Codluma is the better fit for teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis.

  • Greptile fits best

    Teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes

  • Codluma fits best

    Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Greptile 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Codluma 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #4 in Pull Request Automation Tools #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools
Best for Teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $30/seat/mo $29/seat/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 14 days
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 14 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Docs
Compliance SOC 2 SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 9 integrations 48+ integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Greptile 0/4 · Codluma 4/4
AI code review Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automated fixes Not checked yet ✓ (best)
CI failure triage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Review rules Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Git host support Not checked yet Multiple
Deployment options Not checked yet Both
Our review
Pros
  • Repository graphs give reviews context across files and dependencies.
  • Findings include severity ratings and suggested fixes.
  • Supports security review, test generation, analytics, and coding-agent integrations.
  • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
  • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
  • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment
Cons
  • Starter is limited to one active developer and 50 monthly credits.
  • Pro costs $30 per seat per month; additional credits cost $1 each.
  • Self-hosting and SSO/SAML are reserved for Enterprise.
  • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
  • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
  • Support channels list documentation only
Our verdict

Greptile reviews pull requests using indexed repository context, including files, functions, and dependencies. It is aimed at software teams that want findings tied to the wider codebase rather than only the changed lines. Reviews can…

Read the review →

Codluma combines automated pull-request reviews with CI/CD failure analysis, impact analysis and vulnerability scanning. It is aimed at engineering teams that want inline findings and suggested fixes alongside configurable review rules and…

Read the review →
  1. GreptilePull Request Automation Tools 8.7Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. CodlumaPull Request Automation Tools 8.5Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Greptile — where it wins

    • Repository graphs give reviews context across files and dependencies.
    • Findings include severity ratings and suggested fixes.
    • Supports security review, test generation, analytics, and coding-agent integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter is limited to one active developer and 50 monthly credits.
    • Pro costs $30 per seat per month; additional credits cost $1 each.
    • Self-hosting and SSO/SAML are reserved for Enterprise.
  • Codluma — where it wins

    • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
    • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
    • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
    • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
    • Support channels list documentation only
  • Greptile8.7/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Codebase-aware PR reviews with fixes, tests, security analysis, and analytics.

    Visit GreptileFull verdict →
  • Codluma8.5/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Codluma brings PR review, CI diagnosis and policy controls into one workflow.

    Visit CodlumaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update