Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Pull Request Automation Tools

Greptile vs Codluma

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Greptile #4 in Pull Request Automation Tools 6.0/10 Free plan · paid from $30/user/mo · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Greptile
Higher score Codluma #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools 10.0/10 Free plan · paid from $29/user/mo · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Codluma

Greptile leads on 0 checks, Codluma on 5, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCodluma · 10.0/10
  • Lowest starting priceCodluma · $29/user/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresCodluma · 4 of 4

Codluma scores higher on our rubric for pull request automation tools: 10.0 against 6.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #4.

Codluma is cheaper to start at $29/user/mo against $30/user/mo. Codluma offers ai code review; Greptile doesn't publish it. Codluma offers automated fixes; Greptile doesn't publish it. Codluma offers ci failure triage; Greptile doesn't publish it. Codluma offers review rules; Greptile doesn't publish it.

Greptile is the better fit for teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes. Codluma is the better fit for teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis.

  • Greptile fits best

    Teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes

  • Codluma fits best

    Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Greptile 6.0/10 Visit ↗ Codluma 10.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.0 10.0
Ranking #4 in Pull Request Automation Tools #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools
Best for Teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $30/user/mo $29/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 14 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Docs
Compliance SOC 2 SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 9 integrations 48+ integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Greptile 0/4 · Codluma 4/4
AI code review Not published ✓ (best)
Automated fixes Not published ✓ (best)
CI failure triage Not published ✓ (best)
Review rules Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Git host support Not published Multiple
Deployment options Not published Both
Our review
Pros
  • Repository graphs give reviews context across files and dependencies.
  • Findings include severity ratings and suggested fixes.
  • Supports security review, test generation, analytics, and coding-agent integrations.
  • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
  • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
  • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment
Cons
  • Starter is limited to one active developer and 50 monthly credits.
  • Pro costs $30 per seat per month; additional credits cost $1 each.
  • Self-hosting and SSO/SAML are reserved for Enterprise.
  • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
  • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
  • Support channels list documentation only
Our verdict

Greptile reviews pull requests using indexed repository context, including files, functions, and dependencies. It is aimed at software teams that want findings tied to the wider codebase rather than only the changed lines. Reviews can…

Read the review →

Codluma combines automated pull-request reviews with CI/CD failure analysis, impact analysis and vulnerability scanning. It is aimed at engineering teams that want inline findings and suggested fixes alongside configurable review rules and…

Read the review →
  1. GreptilePull Request Automation Tools 6.0Free plan · paid from $30/user/mo · 14-day trial
  2. CodlumaPull Request Automation Tools 10.0Free plan · paid from $29/user/mo · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Greptile — where it wins

    • Repository graphs give reviews context across files and dependencies.
    • Findings include severity ratings and suggested fixes.
    • Supports security review, test generation, analytics, and coding-agent integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter is limited to one active developer and 50 monthly credits.
    • Pro costs $30 per seat per month; additional credits cost $1 each.
    • Self-hosting and SSO/SAML are reserved for Enterprise.

  • Codluma — where it wins

    • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
    • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
    • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
    • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
    • Support channels list documentation only
  • Greptile6.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $30/user/mo · 14-day trial

    Codebase-aware PR reviews with fixes, tests, security analysis, and analytics.

    Visit GreptileFull verdict →
  • Codluma10.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $29/user/mo · 14-day trial

    Codluma brings PR review, CI diagnosis and policy controls into one workflow.

    Visit CodlumaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All pull request automation tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on pull request automation tools

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update