Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Pull Request Automation Tools

Claude Code Review vs Codluma

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Claude Code Review #1 in Pull Request Automation Tools 3.0/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Anthropic
Higher score Codluma #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools 10.0/10 Free plan · paid from $29/user/mo · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Codluma

Claude Code Review leads on 0 checks, Codluma on 5, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCodluma · 10.0/10
  • Free planonly Codluma
  • Most featuresCodluma · 4 of 4

Codluma scores higher on our rubric for pull request automation tools: 10.0 against 3.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #1.

Codluma offers free plan; Claude Code Review doesn't. Codluma offers ai code review; Claude Code Review doesn't publish it. Codluma offers automated fixes; Claude Code Review doesn't publish it. Codluma offers ci failure triage; Claude Code Review doesn't publish it. Codluma offers review rules; Claude Code Review doesn't publish it.

Claude Code Review is the better fit for enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews. Codluma is the better fit for teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis.

  • Claude Code Review fits best

    Enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews

  • Codluma fits best

    Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Claude Code Review 3.0/10 Visit ↗ Codluma 10.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 3.0 10.0
Ranking #1 in Pull Request Automation Tools #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools
Best for Enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published $29/user/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Docs
Compliance SSO/SAML SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 2 integrations 48+ integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Claude Code Review 0/4 · Codluma 4/4
AI code review Not published ✓ (best)
Automated fixes Not published ✓ (best)
CI failure triage Not published ✓ (best)
Review rules Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Git host support Not published Multiple
Deployment options Not published Both
Our review
Pros
  • Parallel specialized agents analyze pull requests for bugs and security issues
  • Confidence filtering prioritizes inline comments with line references
  • Guidance files, review triggers, and analytics support team workflows
  • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
  • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
  • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment
Cons
  • Supports GitHub and GitHub Enterprise Server only
  • Usage is billed separately, with an average review cost of $15–25
  • Available in research preview only for Team and Enterprise plans
  • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
  • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
  • Support channels list documentation only
Our verdict

Claude Code Review is Anthropic’s AI code-review capability for GitHub pull requests, aimed at mid-market and enterprise teams. It uses multiple specialized agents to analyze changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, regressions, and…

Read the review →

Codluma combines automated pull-request reviews with CI/CD failure analysis, impact analysis and vulnerability scanning. It is aimed at engineering teams that want inline findings and suggested fixes alongside configurable review rules and…

Read the review →
  1. Claude Code ReviewPull Request Automation Tools 3.0Paid
  2. CodlumaPull Request Automation Tools 10.0Free plan · paid from $29/user/mo · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Claude Code Review — where it wins

    • Parallel specialized agents analyze pull requests for bugs and security issues
    • Confidence filtering prioritizes inline comments with line references
    • Guidance files, review triggers, and analytics support team workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports GitHub and GitHub Enterprise Server only
    • Usage is billed separately, with an average review cost of $15–25
    • Available in research preview only for Team and Enterprise plans

  • Codluma — where it wins

    • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
    • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
    • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
    • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
    • Support channels list documentation only
  • Claude Code Review3.0/10 · Paid

    A GitHub-focused, multi-agent reviewer for teams that want prioritized inline feedback.

    Visit AnthropicFull verdict →
  • Codluma10.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $29/user/mo · 14-day trial

    Codluma brings PR review, CI diagnosis and policy controls into one workflow.

    Visit CodlumaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All pull request automation tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on pull request automation tools

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026