Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Pull Request Automation Tools

Claude Code Review vs Codluma

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Claude Code Review #1 in Pull Request Automation Tools 9.2/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Anthropic
Codluma #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools 8.5/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Codluma

Claude Code Review leads on 0 checks, Codluma on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreClaude Code Review · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Codluma
  • Free trialonly Codluma
  • Most featuresCodluma · 4 of 4

Claude Code Review scores higher on our rubric for pull request automation tools: 9.2 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

Codluma offers free plan; Claude Code Review doesn't.

Claude Code Review is the better fit for enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews. Codluma is the better fit for teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis.

  • Claude Code Review fits best

    Enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews

  • Codluma fits best

    Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Claude Code Review 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Codluma 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.5
Ranking #1 in Pull Request Automation Tools #6 in Pull Request Automation Tools
Best for Enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews Teams governing reviews and CI diagnosis
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $29/seat/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Docs
Compliance SSO/SAML SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 2 integrations 48+ integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Claude Code Review 0/4 · Codluma 4/4
AI code review Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automated fixes Not checked yet ✓ (best)
CI failure triage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Review rules Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Git host support Not checked yet Multiple
Deployment options Not checked yet Both
Our review
Pros
  • Parallel specialized agents analyze pull requests for bugs and security issues
  • Confidence filtering prioritizes inline comments with line references
  • Guidance files, review triggers, and analytics support team workflows
  • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
  • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
  • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment
Cons
  • Supports GitHub and GitHub Enterprise Server only
  • Usage is billed separately, with an average review cost of $15–25
  • Available in research preview only for Team and Enterprise plans
  • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
  • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
  • Support channels list documentation only
Our verdict

Claude Code Review is Anthropic’s AI code-review capability for GitHub pull requests, aimed at mid-market and enterprise teams. It uses multiple specialized agents to analyze changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, regressions, and…

Read the review →

Codluma combines automated pull-request reviews with CI/CD failure analysis, impact analysis and vulnerability scanning. It is aimed at engineering teams that want inline findings and suggested fixes alongside configurable review rules and…

Read the review →
  1. Claude Code ReviewPull Request Automation Tools 9.2Paid
  2. CodlumaPull Request Automation Tools 8.5Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Claude Code Review — where it wins

    • Parallel specialized agents analyze pull requests for bugs and security issues
    • Confidence filtering prioritizes inline comments with line references
    • Guidance files, review triggers, and analytics support team workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports GitHub and GitHub Enterprise Server only
    • Usage is billed separately, with an average review cost of $15–25
    • Available in research preview only for Team and Enterprise plans
  • Codluma — where it wins

    • Inline findings cover bugs, security, correctness and quality issues
    • Analyzes CI failures and pull-request impact alongside code reviews
    • Supports policy gates and cloud or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 50 PR reviews per month
    • Pro and Business charges are per seat each month
    • Support channels list documentation only
  • Claude Code Review9.2/10 · Paid

    A GitHub-focused, multi-agent reviewer for teams that want prioritized inline feedback.

    Visit AnthropicFull verdict →
  • Codluma8.5/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Codluma brings PR review, CI diagnosis and policy controls into one workflow.

    Visit CodlumaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update