Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Pull Request Automation Tools

Claude Code Review vs Greptile

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Greptile #4 in Pull Request Automation Tools 6.0/10 Free plan · paid from $30/user/mo · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Greptile

Claude Code Review leads on 0 checks, Greptile on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGreptile · 6.0/10
  • Free planonly Greptile

Greptile scores higher on our rubric for pull request automation tools: 6.0 against 3.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #1.

Greptile offers free plan; Claude Code Review doesn't.

Claude Code Review is the better fit for enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews. Greptile is the better fit for teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes.

  • Claude Code Review fits best

    Enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews

  • Greptile fits best

    Teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Claude Code Review 3.0/10 Visit ↗ Greptile 6.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 3.0 6.0
Ranking #1 in Pull Request Automation Tools #4 in Pull Request Automation Tools
Best for Enterprise GitHub teams seeking AI code reviews Teams needing deep codebase-aware reviews and fixes
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published $30/user/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Email, Docs
Compliance SSO/SAML SOC 2
Integrations 2 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Enterprise
Features Claude Code Review 0/4 · Greptile 0/4
AI code review Not published Not published
Automated fixes Not published Not published
CI failure triage Not published Not published
Review rules Not published Not published
Specs
Git host support Not published Not published
Deployment options Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Parallel specialized agents analyze pull requests for bugs and security issues
  • Confidence filtering prioritizes inline comments with line references
  • Guidance files, review triggers, and analytics support team workflows
  • Repository graphs give reviews context across files and dependencies.
  • Findings include severity ratings and suggested fixes.
  • Supports security review, test generation, analytics, and coding-agent integrations.
Cons
  • Supports GitHub and GitHub Enterprise Server only
  • Usage is billed separately, with an average review cost of $15–25
  • Available in research preview only for Team and Enterprise plans
  • Starter is limited to one active developer and 50 monthly credits.
  • Pro costs $30 per seat per month; additional credits cost $1 each.
  • Self-hosting and SSO/SAML are reserved for Enterprise.
Our verdict

Claude Code Review is Anthropic’s AI code-review capability for GitHub pull requests, aimed at mid-market and enterprise teams. It uses multiple specialized agents to analyze changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, regressions, and…

Read the review →

Greptile reviews pull requests using indexed repository context, including files, functions, and dependencies. It is aimed at software teams that want findings tied to the wider codebase rather than only the changed lines. Reviews can…

Read the review →
  1. Claude Code ReviewPull Request Automation Tools 3.0Paid
  2. GreptilePull Request Automation Tools 6.0Free plan · paid from $30/user/mo · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Claude Code Review — where it wins

    • Parallel specialized agents analyze pull requests for bugs and security issues
    • Confidence filtering prioritizes inline comments with line references
    • Guidance files, review triggers, and analytics support team workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports GitHub and GitHub Enterprise Server only
    • Usage is billed separately, with an average review cost of $15–25
    • Available in research preview only for Team and Enterprise plans
  • Greptile — where it wins

    • Repository graphs give reviews context across files and dependencies.
    • Findings include severity ratings and suggested fixes.
    • Supports security review, test generation, analytics, and coding-agent integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter is limited to one active developer and 50 monthly credits.
    • Pro costs $30 per seat per month; additional credits cost $1 each.
    • Self-hosting and SSO/SAML are reserved for Enterprise.
  • Claude Code Review3.0/10 · Paid

    A GitHub-focused, multi-agent reviewer for teams that want prioritized inline feedback.

    Visit AnthropicFull verdict →
  • Greptile6.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $30/user/mo · 14-day trial

    Codebase-aware PR reviews with fixes, tests, security analysis, and analytics.

    Visit GreptileFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on pull request automation tools

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026