Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Text Editors

GNU Emacs vs Vim

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score GNU Emacs #3 in Text Editors 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit GNU Emacs
Vim #6 in Text Editors 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Vim

GNU Emacs leads on 0 checks, Vim on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGNU Emacs · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresGNU Emacs · 5 of 5

GNU Emacs scores higher on our rubric for text editors: 9.2 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

GNU Emacs is the better fit for mature customization-focused editor users. Vim is the better fit for vim users wanting a mature free editor.

  • GNU Emacs fits best

    Mature customization-focused editor users

  • Vim fits best

    Vim users wanting a mature free editor

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature GNU Emacs 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Vim 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.9
Ranking #3 in Text Editors #6 in Text Editors
Best for Mature customization-focused editor users Vim users wanting a mature free editor
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop, Mobile Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux, Android Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features GNU Emacs 5/5 · Vim 3/5
Multi-cursor editing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Macro recording ✓ ✓
Column editing ✓ ✓
Large-file handling ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Extension support ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported platforms GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, BSD, Haiku, Solaris, MS-DOS/FreeDOS Windows, macOS, Linux
Our review
Pros
  • Free/libre and open source with no paid plans
  • Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling
  • Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC
  • Free and open source across Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Macros, blockwise editing, windows, and buffers support precise workflows
  • Plugins, scripting, syntax highlighting, and filetype tools extend its scope
Cons
  • Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature
  • Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing
  • Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings
  • Modal editing can be less suitable for users who prefer conventional editors
  • Multi-cursor editing is not a built-in feature
  • Terminal and GUI options may appeal to different workflows unevenly
Our verdict

GNU Emacs is a free/libre, open-source text editor and computing environment for users who want extensive control over editing behavior. It provides content-aware editing modes, syntax coloring for many file types, Unicode support for…

Read the review →

Vim is a highly configurable, modal text editor for creating and changing text. It suits programmers and other users working with source code, configuration files, email, and general text. The editor runs in terminals and also offers…

Read the review →
  1. GNU EmacsText Editors 9.2Free plan
  2. VimText Editors 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • GNU Emacs — where it wins

    • Free/libre and open source with no paid plans
    • Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling
    • Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC

    Where it doesn't

    • Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature
    • Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing
    • Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings

  • Vim — where it wins

    • Free and open source across Windows, macOS, and Linux
    • Macros, blockwise editing, windows, and buffers support precise workflows
    • Plugins, scripting, syntax highlighting, and filetype tools extend its scope

    Where it doesn't

    • Modal editing can be less suitable for users who prefer conventional editors
    • Multi-cursor editing is not a built-in feature
    • Terminal and GUI options may appeal to different workflows unevenly

More comparisons

All text editors comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update