Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Text Editors

Neovim vs Vim

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Neovim #2 in Text Editors 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Neovim
Vim #6 in Text Editors 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Vim

Neovim leads on 0 checks, Vim on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNeovim · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresNeovim · 5 of 5

Neovim scores higher on our rubric for text editors: 9.3 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Neovim is the better fit for power users wanting maximum free customization. Vim is the better fit for vim users wanting a mature free editor.

  • Neovim fits best

    Power users wanting maximum free customization

  • Vim fits best

    Vim users wanting a mature free editor

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Neovim 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Vim 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.9
Ranking #2 in Text Editors #6 in Text Editors
Best for Power users wanting maximum free customization Vim users wanting a mature free editor
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop, Mobile Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux, Android Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Neovim 5/5 · Vim 3/5
Multi-cursor editing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Macro recording ✓ ✓
Column editing ✓ ✓
Large-file handling ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Extension support ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported platforms Linux, macOS, Windows, Android Windows, macOS, Linux
Our review
Pros
  • Free and open source across Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Lua, Vimscript, remote plugins, and a documented versioned API
  • Tree-sitter, LSP, terminal support, and large-file performance
  • Free and open source across Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Macros, blockwise editing, windows, and buffers support precise workflows
  • Plugins, scripting, syntax highlighting, and filetype tools extend its scope
Cons
  • Modal editing favors users comfortable with keyboard-driven workflows
  • Extensive customization depends on scripting and configuration
  • Verified integration coverage is limited
  • Modal editing can be less suitable for users who prefer conventional editors
  • Multi-cursor editing is not a built-in feature
  • Terminal and GUI options may appeal to different workflows unevenly
Our verdict

Neovim is a free, open-source Vim-based text editor for developers and technical users who prefer keyboard-driven editing and extensive customization. It runs locally on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and supports Vim-compatible modal editing,…

Read the review →

Vim is a highly configurable, modal text editor for creating and changing text. It suits programmers and other users working with source code, configuration files, email, and general text. The editor runs in terminals and also offers…

Read the review →
  1. NeovimText Editors 9.3Free plan
  2. VimText Editors 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Neovim — where it wins

    • Free and open source across Linux, macOS, and Windows
    • Lua, Vimscript, remote plugins, and a documented versioned API
    • Tree-sitter, LSP, terminal support, and large-file performance

    Where it doesn't

    • Modal editing favors users comfortable with keyboard-driven workflows
    • Extensive customization depends on scripting and configuration
    • Verified integration coverage is limited
  • Vim — where it wins

    • Free and open source across Windows, macOS, and Linux
    • Macros, blockwise editing, windows, and buffers support precise workflows
    • Plugins, scripting, syntax highlighting, and filetype tools extend its scope

    Where it doesn't

    • Modal editing can be less suitable for users who prefer conventional editors
    • Multi-cursor editing is not a built-in feature
    • Terminal and GUI options may appeal to different workflows unevenly

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update