GNU Emacs vs Notepad++

GEGNU Emacs9.2Visit Notepad++9.1Visit

Higher score GE GNU Emacs #3 in Text Editors 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit GNU Emacs

vs

Notepad++ #4 in Text Editors 9.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Notepad++

• GNU Emacs fits best

  Mature customization-focused editor users

• Notepad++ fits best

  Windows users wanting a capable free editor

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	GEGNU Emacs 9.2/10 Visit ↗	Notepad++ 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.2	9.1
Ranking	#3 in Text Editors	#4 in Text Editors
Best for	Mature customization-focused editor users	Windows users wanting a capable free editor
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Desktop, Mobile	Desktop
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux, Android	Windows
Support	Email, Community, Docs	Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business	Solo, Small business
Features GNU Emacs 5/5 · Notepad++ 5/5
Multi-cursor editing	✓	✓
Macro recording	✓	✓
Column editing	✓	✓
Large-file handling	✓	✓
Extension support	✓	✓
Specs
Supported platforms	GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, BSD, Haiku, Solaris, MS-DOS/FreeDOS	Windows
Our review
Pros	Free/libre and open source with no paid plans Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC	Multi-cursor, multi-selection, and column editing support Macros, regex search, workspaces, and project panels Free, open-source software under the GNU GPL license
Cons	Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings	Windows-only availability Designed for local desktop use rather than browser editing Large-file restrictions may affect very large documents
Our verdict	GNU Emacs is a free/libre, open-source text editor and computing environment for users who want extensive control over editing behavior. It provides content-aware editing modes, syntax coloring for many file types, Unicode support for… Read the review →	Notepad++ is a free, open-source text and source-code editor for Microsoft Windows. It supports syntax highlighting for programming and natural languages, making it suitable for developers, technical users, and anyone who wants more… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• GNU Emacs — where it wins

  • Free/libre and open source with no paid plans
  • Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling
  • Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC

  Where it doesn't

  • Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature
  • Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing
  • Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings

• Notepad++ — where it wins

  • Multi-cursor, multi-selection, and column editing support
  • Macros, regex search, workspaces, and project panels
  • Free, open-source software under the GNU GPL license

  Where it doesn't

  • Windows-only availability
  • Designed for local desktop use rather than browser editing
  • Large-file restrictions may affect very large documents

• GEGNU Emacs9.2/10 · Free plan

  A mature, highly customizable editor for users who value breadth and control.

  Visit GNU EmacsFull verdict →
• Notepad++9.1/10 · Free plan

  A capable free editor with advanced editing tools, but Windows-only coverage narrows its fit.

  Visit Notepad++Full verdict →