Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Text Editors

Visual Studio Code vs GNU Emacs

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Visual Studio Code #1 in Text Editors 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit site
GNU Emacs #3 in Text Editors 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit GNU Emacs

Visual Studio Code leads on 0 checks, GNU Emacs on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreVisual Studio Code · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresGNU Emacs · 5 of 5

Visual Studio Code scores higher on our rubric for text editors: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Visual Studio Code is the better fit for developers wanting the broadest free editor. GNU Emacs is the better fit for mature customization-focused editor users.

  • Visual Studio Code fits best

    Developers wanting the broadest free editor

  • GNU Emacs fits best

    Mature customization-focused editor users

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Visual Studio Code 9.4/10 Visit ↗ GNU Emacs 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.2
Ranking #1 in Text Editors #3 in Text Editors
Best for Developers wanting the broadest free editor Mature customization-focused editor users
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux, Android
Support Docs Email, Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business
Features Visual Studio Code 4/5 · GNU Emacs 5/5
Multi-cursor editing ✓ ✓
Macro recording Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Column editing ✓ ✓
Large-file handling ✓ ✓
Extension support ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported platforms web, windows, macos, linux GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, BSD, Haiku, Solaris, MS-DOS/FreeDOS
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source access on desktop and in the browser
  • Multi-cursor editing, IntelliSense, navigation, debugging, and testing
  • Git, terminal, extensions, SSH, Dev Containers, and Codespaces support
  • Free/libre and open source with no paid plans
  • Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling
  • Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC
Cons
  • Focused on source-code work rather than general-purpose text editing
  • Optional AI features and agent workflows are not the core editor experience
  • Large files require confirmation and optimized handling
  • Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature
  • Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing
  • Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings
Our verdict

Visual Studio Code is a free, open-source source-code editor for developers working with individual files or complete projects. It runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and the web, making it suitable for people who move between desktop and…

Read the review →

GNU Emacs is a free/libre, open-source text editor and computing environment for users who want extensive control over editing behavior. It provides content-aware editing modes, syntax coloring for many file types, Unicode support for…

Read the review →
  1. Visual Studio CodeText Editors 9.4Free plan
  2. GNU EmacsText Editors 9.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Visual Studio Code — where it wins

    • Free, open-source access on desktop and in the browser
    • Multi-cursor editing, IntelliSense, navigation, debugging, and testing
    • Git, terminal, extensions, SSH, Dev Containers, and Codespaces support

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on source-code work rather than general-purpose text editing
    • Optional AI features and agent workflows are not the core editor experience
    • Large files require confirmation and optimized handling

  • GNU Emacs — where it wins

    • Free/libre and open source with no paid plans
    • Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling
    • Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC

    Where it doesn't

    • Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature
    • Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing
    • Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings
  • Visual Studio Code9.4/10 · Free plan

    A free, open-source editor with broad development features across desktop and web.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • GNU Emacs9.2/10 · Free plan

    A mature, highly customizable editor for users who value breadth and control.

    Visit GNU EmacsFull verdict →

More comparisons

All text editors comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update