Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · FTP Hosting

Files.com vs Cloud FTP

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Files.com #4 in FTP Hosting 5.0/10 From $199/mo · 7-day trial ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Files.com
Cloud FTP #7 in FTP Hosting 4.0/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Google Cloud

Files.com leads on 0 checks, Cloud FTP on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFiles.com · 5.0/10

Files.com scores higher on our rubric for ftp hosting: 5.0 against 4.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Files.com is the better fit for enterprise file sharing and transfer workflows. Cloud FTP is the better fit for google Cloud SFTP infrastructure.

  • Files.com fits best

    Enterprise file sharing and transfer workflows

  • Cloud FTP fits best

    Google Cloud SFTP infrastructure

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Files.com 5.0/10 Visit ↗ Cloud FTP 4.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 5.0 4.0
Ranking #4 in FTP Hosting #7 in FTP Hosting
Best for Enterprise file sharing and transfer workflows Google Cloud SFTP infrastructure
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $199/mo Not published
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Live chat, Phone Docs, Community, Tickets
Integrations 89+ integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Files.com 0/2 · Cloud FTP 0/2
Automated backups Not published Not published
Web file manager Not published Not published
Specs
Storage limit Not published Not published
Monthly transfer Not published Not published
FTP accounts Not published Not published
Access protocols Not published Sftp
Our review
Pros
  • Broad protocol coverage with SFTP, FTP, FTPS, WebDAV, HTTPS, and AS2
  • APIs, SDKs, CLI, webhooks, automations, and sync flows
  • Share links, access logs, custom branding, and desktop and mobile access
  • Connects SFTP users directly to Cloud Storage buckets
  • Supports public, VPC, and Private Service Connect deployments
  • Offers APIs, key-based access, and up to 500 concurrent sessions
Cons
  • Starts at $199 per month, limiting fit for smaller deployments
  • No free plan, with a 7-day trial instead
  • Advanced security and governance features begin with the Power plan
  • Supports SFTP only, rather than multiple file-transfer protocols
  • Usage-based billing can require tracking server hours and transferred data
  • Cloud Storage and related Google Cloud charges are billed separately
Our verdict

Files.com is a cloud-based file orchestration platform for organizations that exchange files with customers, partners, employees, and business systems. It combines managed file transfer, browser-based sharing, workflow automation,…

Read the review →

Cloud FTP is a managed SFTP service from Google Cloud for organizations moving files between users, partners, applications, and Cloud Storage. It supports standard SFTP clients such as Cyberduck, FileZilla, and WinSCP, making it suitable…

Read the review →
  1. Files.comFTP Hosting 5.0From $199/mo · 7-day trial
  2. Cloud FTPFTP Hosting 4.0Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Files.com — where it wins

    • Broad protocol coverage with SFTP, FTP, FTPS, WebDAV, HTTPS, and AS2
    • APIs, SDKs, CLI, webhooks, automations, and sync flows
    • Share links, access logs, custom branding, and desktop and mobile access

    Where it doesn't

    • Starts at $199 per month, limiting fit for smaller deployments
    • No free plan, with a 7-day trial instead
    • Advanced security and governance features begin with the Power plan
  • Cloud FTP — where it wins

    • Connects SFTP users directly to Cloud Storage buckets
    • Supports public, VPC, and Private Service Connect deployments
    • Offers APIs, key-based access, and up to 500 concurrent sessions

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports SFTP only, rather than multiple file-transfer protocols
    • Usage-based billing can require tracking server hours and transferred data
    • Cloud Storage and related Google Cloud charges are billed separately

More comparisons

Guides on FTP hosting

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026