Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Agentic Ides

Cursor vs Google Antigravity IDE

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Cursor #1 in Agentic Ides 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Cursor
Google Antigravity IDE #2 in Agentic Ides 9.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit site

Cursor leads on 0 checks, Google Antigravity IDE on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCursor · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth

Cursor scores higher on our rubric for agentic ides: 9.3 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Cursor is the better fit for developers and teams building with AI coding agents. Google Antigravity IDE is the better fit for developers who want parallel agents and browser workflows.

  • Cursor fits best

    Developers and teams building with AI coding agents

  • Google Antigravity IDE fits best

    Developers who want parallel agents and browser workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cursor 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Google Antigravity IDE 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.1
Ranking #1 in Agentic Ides #2 in Agentic Ides
Best for Developers and teams building with AI coding agents Developers who want parallel agents and browser workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $20/user/mo $20/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs, Community Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Cursor 0/5 · Google Antigravity IDE 0/5
Autonomous agent Not checked yet Not checked yet
Multi-file editing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Terminal control Not checked yet Not checked yet
Codebase indexing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Local model support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Model selection Not checked yet Not checked yet
Distribution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Agents can make coordinated multi-file changes and use terminal tools.
  • Repository indexing supports codebase-aware chat and editing.
  • Available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with personal and business plans.
  • Agents work across the editor, terminal, and browser, with parallel local runs.
  • Artifacts include plans, code diffs, diagrams, images, and browser recordings.
  • Terminal sandboxing and permission controls offer safeguards for agent commands.
Cons
  • Hobby includes limited AI usage.
  • Paid plans span $20 to $200 per user monthly, depending on the tier.
  • Desktop-only deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted editor.
  • The Individual plan has basic weekly rate limits.
  • The $20 Pro plan adds rate limits and credits, not a different feature set.
  • Documentation is the listed support channel.
Our verdict

Cursor is a desktop code editor for developers and software teams who want AI assistance integrated into coding. Inline completion and conversational code chat support everyday edits, while repository indexing provides codebase context.…

Read the review →

Google Antigravity IDE brings AI agents into a desktop development environment for individual developers, from hobbyists to professionals. Available for macOS, Windows, and Linux, it combines Tab autocomplete and natural-language code…

Read the review →
  1. CursorAgentic Ides 9.3Free plan
  2. Google Antigravity IDEAgentic Ides 9.1Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cursor — where it wins

    • Agents can make coordinated multi-file changes and use terminal tools.
    • Repository indexing supports codebase-aware chat and editing.
    • Available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with personal and business plans.

    Where it doesn't

    • Hobby includes limited AI usage.
    • Paid plans span $20 to $200 per user monthly, depending on the tier.
    • Desktop-only deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted editor.

  • Google Antigravity IDE — where it wins

    • Agents work across the editor, terminal, and browser, with parallel local runs.
    • Artifacts include plans, code diffs, diagrams, images, and browser recordings.
    • Terminal sandboxing and permission controls offer safeguards for agent commands.

    Where it doesn't

    • The Individual plan has basic weekly rate limits.
    • The $20 Pro plan adds rate limits and credits, not a different feature set.
    • Documentation is the listed support channel.
  • Cursor9.3/10 · Free plan

    A full-featured desktop agent IDE, with a free entry plan and paid tiers from $20 monthly.

    Visit CursorFull verdict →
  • Google Antigravity IDE9.1/10 · Free plan

    A cross-platform IDE for parallel coding agents and browser workflows, with a free individual tier.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

All agentic ides comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update