Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Agentic Ides

Cursor vs Kilo Code

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Cursor #1 in Agentic Ides 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Cursor
Kilo Code #6 in Agentic Ides 8.6/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 5 features Visit Kilo Code

Cursor leads on 0 checks, Kilo Code on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCursor · 9.3/10
  • Lowest starting priceKilo Code · $15/user/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Kilo Code
  • Most featuresKilo Code · 1 of 5

Cursor scores higher on our rubric for agentic ides: 9.3 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

Kilo Code is cheaper to start at $15/user/mo against $20/user/mo.

Cursor is the better fit for developers and teams building with AI coding agents. Kilo Code is the better fit for developers seeking open IDE integrations and model choice.

  • Cursor fits best

    Developers and teams building with AI coding agents

  • Kilo Code fits best

    Developers seeking open IDE integrations and model choice

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cursor 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Kilo Code 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.6
Ranking #1 in Agentic Ides #6 in Agentic Ides
Best for Developers and teams building with AI coding agents Developers seeking open IDE integrations and model choice
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $20/user/mo $15/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web, iOS, Android
Support Docs, Community Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cursor 0/5 · Kilo Code 1/5
Autonomous agent Not checked yet Not checked yet
Multi-file editing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Terminal control Not checked yet Not checked yet
Codebase indexing Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Local model support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Model selection Not checked yet Not checked yet
Distribution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Agents can make coordinated multi-file changes and use terminal tools.
  • Repository indexing supports codebase-aware chat and editing.
  • Available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with personal and business plans.
  • Works across VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, CLI, cloud agents, and mobile apps
  • Supports hosted, BYOK, and local models, including Ollama and LM Studio
  • Offers chat, completion, specialized agents, and parallel Git worktrees
Cons
  • Hobby includes limited AI usage.
  • Paid plans span $20 to $200 per user monthly, depending on the tier.
  • Desktop-only deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted editor.
  • AI inference and cloud compute may be billed separately from free platform access
  • Teams features such as shared agent modes require a paid plan
  • Enterprise capabilities and support are separated into a distinct tier
Our verdict

Cursor is a desktop code editor for developers and software teams who want AI assistance integrated into coding. Inline completion and conversational code chat support everyday edits, while repository indexing provides codebase context.…

Read the review →

Kilo Code is an open-source AI coding assistant for individual developers and engineering teams. It brings conversational coding, autocomplete, code generation, refactoring, debugging, and code review into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI,…

Read the review →
  1. CursorAgentic Ides 9.3Free plan
  2. Kilo CodeAgentic Ides 8.6Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cursor — where it wins

    • Agents can make coordinated multi-file changes and use terminal tools.
    • Repository indexing supports codebase-aware chat and editing.
    • Available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with personal and business plans.

    Where it doesn't

    • Hobby includes limited AI usage.
    • Paid plans span $20 to $200 per user monthly, depending on the tier.
    • Desktop-only deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted editor.

  • Kilo Code — where it wins

    • Works across VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, CLI, cloud agents, and mobile apps
    • Supports hosted, BYOK, and local models, including Ollama and LM Studio
    • Offers chat, completion, specialized agents, and parallel Git worktrees

    Where it doesn't

    • AI inference and cloud compute may be billed separately from free platform access
    • Teams features such as shared agent modes require a paid plan
    • Enterprise capabilities and support are separated into a distinct tier
  • Cursor9.3/10 · Free plan

    A full-featured desktop agent IDE, with a free entry plan and paid tiers from $20 monthly.

    Visit CursorFull verdict →
  • Kilo Code8.6/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A flexible coding assistant with broad model choice and a free individual plan.

    Visit Kilo CodeFull verdict →

More comparisons

All agentic ides comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update