Head-to-head · Video Interviewing Software
Criteria vs Spark Hire
Criteria leads on 0 checks, Spark Hire on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCriteria · 8.6/10
Criteria scores higher on our rubric for video interviewing software: 8.6 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
Criteria is the better fit for structured, collaborative enterprise interviewing. Spark Hire is the better fit for mature teams prioritizing ATS connectivity.
- Criteria fits best
Structured, collaborative enterprise interviewing
- Spark Hire fits best
Mature teams prioritizing ATS connectivity
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Criteria 8.6/10 Visit ↗ | Spark Hire 8.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Ranking | #3 in Video Interviewing Software | #5 in Video Interviewing Software |
| Best for | Structured, collaborative enterprise interviewing | Mature teams prioritizing ATS connectivity |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | $249/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Chrome extension |
| Integrations | 50+ integrations | 3 integrations |
| Features Criteria 5/5 · Spark Hire 5/5 | ||
| Live interviews | ✓ | ✓ |
| Asynchronous interviews | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interview recording | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interview templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| ATS integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Candidate limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Included team seats | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Criteria is a web-based video interviewing product for employers and hiring teams that need consistent candidate evaluation. It supports asynchronous, one-way interviews with candidate-recorded responses alongside real-time, two-way… Read the review → |
Spark Hire is hiring software for organizations that screen and interview candidates. Its Meet solution supports one-way video interviews, live video interviews, recording and replay, reusable question sets, candidate invitations,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Criteria — where it wins
- Supports both live and one-way recorded video interviews
- Combines rubrics, blind review, scoring, and independent evaluations
- Offers AI transcripts, summaries, insights, and eight ATS integrations
Where it doesn't
- Pricing is handled through a request-pricing flow
- The product is available through the web platform
- Its structured workflow may not suit informal video screening
Spark Hire — where it wins
- Supports both live and one-way video interviews
- Connects with 40+ ATS integrations plus Zapier
- Includes scorecards, reminders, recording, and AI-assisted review
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is available
- API access is an add-on
- Pricing varies by company size
- Criteria8.6/10 · Pricing on request
A mature web-based interview suite for structured, collaborative enterprise hiring.
Visit CriteriaFull verdict → - Spark Hire8.4/10 · Paid
A mature video interview platform with strong ATS connectivity and paid-only access.
Visit Spark HireFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Jobma vs Criteria
- Jobma vs Spark Hire
- VidCruiter vs Criteria
- VidCruiter vs Spark Hire
- Criteria vs Talview
- Criteria vs HireVue
- Criteria vs Willo
- Criteria vs Hireflix
All video interviewing software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






