Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Productivity Bots Software

Chaser vs Standuply

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Chaser #4 in Productivity Bots Software 7.6/10 From $7/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Chaser
Standuply #6 in Productivity Bots Software 7.3/10 Free plan · paid from $1.50/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Standuply

Chaser leads on 2 checks, Standuply on 2, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreChaser · 7.6/10
  • Lowest starting priceStanduply · $1.5/user/mo
  • Free planonly Standuply
  • Most featuresChaser · 2 of 2

Chaser scores higher on our rubric for productivity bots software: 7.6 against 7.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Standuply offers free plan; Chaser doesn't. Standuply is cheaper to start at $1.5/user/mo against $7/user/mo. Chaser offers workflow automation; Standuply doesn't publish it. Chaser offers scheduled tasks; Standuply doesn't publish it.

Chaser is the better fit for slack teams tracking tasks from conversations. Standuply is the better fit for agile teams automating standups and retrospectives.

  • Chaser fits best

    Slack teams tracking tasks from conversations

  • Standuply fits best

    Agile teams automating standups and retrospectives

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Chaser 7.6/10 Visit ↗ Standuply 7.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.6 7.3
Ranking #4 in Productivity Bots Software #6 in Productivity Bots Software
Best for Slack teams tracking tasks from conversations Agile teams automating standups and retrospectives
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $7/user/mo $1.5/user/mo (best)
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 30 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Browser extension Cloud
Platforms Web, Chrome extension Web
Support Email, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations 6,000+ integrations 11 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Chaser 2/2 · Standuply 0/2
Workflow automation ✓ (best) Not published
Scheduled tasks ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Bot channels Chat Not published
Knowledge sources Not published Not published
Deployment Cloud Not published
Max active bots Not published Not published
Seat limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Create and assign tasks directly from Slack conversations or commands
  • Automate reminders, follow-ups, and recurring tasks
  • Track work with dashboards, reports, calendars, and time tracking
  • Automates standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, and planning poker
  • Connects with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Trello, GitHub, and Asana
  • Offers a free plan and paid options billed per user or at a flat fee
Cons
  • No free plan; paid access starts at $7 per seat monthly with annual billing
  • Task management is centered on Slack, not a general-purpose bot
  • The Full Workspace plan includes seats for all Members and Multi-Channel Guests
  • Starter limits automation to 3 respondents
  • Backlog refinement and planning poker are Business plan features
  • The Team per-user price is higher with monthly billing than annual billing
Our verdict

Chaser turns work discussed in Slack into assigned tasks with due dates, reminders, and follow-ups. Teams can create tasks from messages or commands, assign them to individuals, groups, or channels, and schedule recurring work. It is aimed…

Read the review →

Standuply is a workflow-automation bot for Agile teams working in Slack or Microsoft Teams. It supports asynchronous standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, planning poker, polls, and surveys, with text, voice, and video responses.…

Read the review →
  1. ChaserProductivity Bots Software 7.6From $7/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial
  2. StanduplyProductivity Bots Software 7.3Free plan · paid from $1.50/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Chaser — where it wins

    • Create and assign tasks directly from Slack conversations or commands
    • Automate reminders, follow-ups, and recurring tasks
    • Track work with dashboards, reports, calendars, and time tracking

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; paid access starts at $7 per seat monthly with annual billing
    • Task management is centered on Slack, not a general-purpose bot
    • The Full Workspace plan includes seats for all Members and Multi-Channel Guests

  • Standuply — where it wins

    • Automates standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, and planning poker
    • Connects with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Trello, GitHub, and Asana
    • Offers a free plan and paid options billed per user or at a flat fee

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter limits automation to 3 respondents
    • Backlog refinement and planning poker are Business plan features
    • The Team per-user price is higher with monthly billing than annual billing
  • Chaser7.6/10 · From $7/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial

    A Slack-focused task manager with recurring work, reminders, dashboards, and AI-agent support.

    Visit ChaserFull verdict →
  • Standuply7.3/10 · Free plan · paid from $1.50/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

    Automates async standups, retrospectives, and Agile team workflows.

    Visit StanduplyFull verdict →

More comparisons

All productivity bots software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update