Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Social Work Case Management

Bonterra Apricot vs CHARMS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
Higher score Bonterra Apricot #1 in Social Work Case Management 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 1 features Visit Bonterra
CHARMS #6 in Social Work Case Management 7.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 1 features Visit CHARMS

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBonterra Apricot · 8.8/10

Bonterra Apricot scores higher on our rubric for social work case management: 8.8 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

Bonterra Apricot is the better fit for nonprofits tracking outcomes and participant engagement. CHARMS is the better fit for multi-agency teams managing placements and care plans.

  • Bonterra Apricot fits best

    Nonprofits tracking outcomes and participant engagement

  • CHARMS fits best

    Multi-agency teams managing placements and care plans

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Bonterra Apricot 8.8/10 Visit ↗ CHARMS 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 7.9
Ranking #1 in Social Work Case Management #6 in Social Work Case Management
Best for Nonprofits tracking outcomes and participant engagement Multi-agency teams managing placements and care plans
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs, Community Phone
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SSO/SAML, 2FA GDPR
Integrations 4 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Bonterra Apricot 0/1 · CHARMS 0/1
Client portal Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Case management features Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Reporting tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Documented integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Connects participant and program records with caseload and referral management
  • Supports outcome measurement, reporting, dashboards, and workflow automation
  • Pro and Enterprise add participant portals and API integrations
  • Links referrals and placements with care plans and outcome tracking
  • Chronological records, audit trails and role-based access controls
  • Secure portals support multi-agency collaboration
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting Bonterra
  • Participant Connect is limited to Pro and Enterprise
  • Support channels listed are documentation and community
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Designed for social care rather than general-purpose case management
  • Web-only access may not suit teams seeking a dedicated mobile app
Our verdict

Bonterra Apricot brings participant and program case management together with configurable forms, referrals, outcome tracking, and reporting. It is aimed at nonprofit organizations and public sector agencies that need to organize…

Read the review →

CHARMS is a cloud-based case management platform for organisations delivering children's and adults' social care. Its settings include fostering, adoption, residential care, supported accommodation, shared lives, family hubs, homelessness…

Read the review →
  1. Bonterra ApricotSocial Work Case Management 8.8Pricing on request
  2. CHARMSSocial Work Case Management 7.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Bonterra Apricot — where it wins

    • Connects participant and program records with caseload and referral management
    • Supports outcome measurement, reporting, dashboards, and workflow automation
    • Pro and Enterprise add participant portals and API integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Bonterra
    • Participant Connect is limited to Pro and Enterprise
    • Support channels listed are documentation and community
  • CHARMS — where it wins

    • Links referrals and placements with care plans and outcome tracking
    • Chronological records, audit trails and role-based access controls
    • Secure portals support multi-agency collaboration

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Designed for social care rather than general-purpose case management
    • Web-only access may not suit teams seeking a dedicated mobile app
  • Bonterra Apricot8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A nonprofit case management system that connects records, referrals, outcomes, and participant portals.

    Visit BonterraFull verdict →
  • CHARMS7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad care-record and placement system for teams coordinating services across agencies.

    Visit CHARMSFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update