Head-to-head · Mobile Development IDEs
B4X vs B4i
B4X leads on 1 check, B4i on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreB4X · 8.0/10
- Free planonly B4X
B4X scores higher on our rubric for mobile development ides: 8.0 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #8 and #9.
B4X offers free plan; B4i doesn't.
B4X is the better fit for native Android and iOS developers. B4i is the better fit for low-cost Windows iOS development.
- B4X fits best
Native Android and iOS developers
- B4i fits best
Low-cost Windows iOS development
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | B4X 8.0/10 Visit ↗ | B4i 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.0 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #8 in Mobile Development IDEs | #9 in Mobile Development IDEs |
| Best for | Native Android and iOS developers | Low-cost Windows iOS development |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $59/user one-time | $26/yr |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Deployment | Desktop, Mobile | Desktop, Cloud |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, iOS |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs | Email, Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features B4X 3/3 · B4i 3/3 | ||
| Emulator or simulator | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visual UI designer | ✓ | ✓ |
| App packaging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Mobile targets | Android, iOS | iOS |
| Desktop platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Supported languages | B4X, Java | B4X |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | B4X is a suite from Anywhere Software for building native Android and iOS applications, along with desktop, server and IoT software. B4A targets Android, B4i targets iOS, B4J supports desktop and server development, and B4R supports… Read the review → |
B4i is a Windows-based development environment for building native iOS applications with B4X, a Visual Basic-like programming language. It is aimed at solo developers, small teams, and organizations that want to create iPhone and iPad… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
B4X — where it wins
- Native Android and iOS application development
- Code and layout reuse across B4A, B4i and B4J
- Visual designers, emulators and device debugging
Where it doesn't
- B4i requires a paid perpetual developer license
- Local Mac builder is needed for iOS simulator support
- The suite spans several products rather than one focused IDE
B4i — where it wins
- Native iOS compilation with visual UI design and device debugging
- $59 perpetual Standard license with local Mac compilation
- Hosted Mac Builder option removes the need for a local Mac
Where it doesn't
- Development targets iOS rather than multiple mobile platforms
- Local compilation requires a Mac computer
- No trial version; the IDE uses a B4X programming language
- B4X8.0/10 · Free plan
A broad B4X suite for native Android and iOS work with reusable code and visual designers.
Visit B4XFull verdict → - B4i7.9/10 · Paid
A low-cost route to native iOS development from Windows, with Mac-based compilation options.
Visit B4iFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Delphi vs B4X
- Ionic Framework vs B4X
- MobileTogether Designer vs B4X
- Xojo vs B4X
- Codename One vs B4X
- LiveCode vs B4X
- C++Builder vs B4X
All mobile development IDEs comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update








