Head-to-head · Mobile Development IDEs
Xojo vs B4X
Xojo leads on 0 checks, B4X on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreXojo · 8.5/10
- Free planboth
Xojo scores higher on our rubric for mobile development ides: 8.5 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.
Xojo is the better fit for visual cross-platform app development. B4X is the better fit for native Android and iOS developers.
- Xojo fits best
Visual cross-platform app development
- B4X fits best
Native Android and iOS developers
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Xojo 8.5/10 Visit ↗ | B4X 8.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Ranking | #4 in Mobile Development IDEs | #8 in Mobile Development IDEs |
| Best for | Visual cross-platform app development | Native Android and iOS developers |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $499 one-time | $59/user one-time |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Money-back guarantee | 90 days | 30 days |
| Deployment | Desktop, Mobile | Desktop, Mobile |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs | Email, Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Xojo 3/3 · B4X 3/3 | ||
| Emulator or simulator | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visual UI designer | ✓ | ✓ |
| App packaging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Mobile targets | iOS, Android | Android, iOS |
| Desktop platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Supported languages | Xojo programming language | B4X, Java |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Xojo combines an IDE and programming language for building native applications across mobile, desktop, web, and console targets. It is aimed at independent developers, students, teams, and organizations that want one development… Read the review → |
B4X is a suite from Anywhere Software for building native Android and iOS applications, along with desktop, server and IoT software. B4A targets Android, B4i targets iOS, B4J supports desktop and server development, and B4R supports… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Xojo — where it wins
- Visual builder with native iOS and Android controls
- Integrated editor, compiler, debugger, and emulators
- Native apps across mobile, desktop, and web targets
Where it doesn't
- Mobile development requires a paid license
- iOS projects require a Mac
- Advanced support tiers cost up to $1,999 one time
B4X — where it wins
- Native Android and iOS application development
- Code and layout reuse across B4A, B4i and B4J
- Visual designers, emulators and device debugging
Where it doesn't
- B4i requires a paid perpetual developer license
- Local Mac builder is needed for iOS simulator support
- The suite spans several products rather than one focused IDE
- Xojo8.5/10 · Free plan
A capable visual IDE for cross-platform apps, with mobile development starting at $499 one time.
Visit XojoFull verdict → - B4X8.0/10 · Free plan
A broad B4X suite for native Android and iOS work with reusable code and visual designers.
Visit B4XFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Delphi vs Xojo
- Delphi vs B4X
- Ionic Framework vs Xojo
- Ionic Framework vs B4X
- MobileTogether Designer vs Xojo
- MobileTogether Designer vs B4X
- Xojo vs Codename One
- Xojo vs LiveCode
All mobile development IDEs comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






