Head-to-head · Window Management Software
awesome vs komorebi
awesome leads on 0 checks, komorebi on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreawesome · 9.1/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresawesome · 4 of 4
awesome scores higher on our rubric for window management software: 9.1 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #11.
awesome is the better fit for linux users who want Lua customization. komorebi is the better fit for windows and Mac users needing flexible tiling.
- awesome fits best
Linux users who want Lua customization
- komorebi fits best
Windows and Mac users needing flexible tiling
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | awesome 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | komorebi 8.3/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Ranking | #4 in Window Management Software | #11 in Window Management Software |
| Best for | Linux users who want Lua customization | Windows and Mac users needing flexible tiling |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | $110/user/yr |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Linux | Windows, macOS |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 3 integrations |
| Features awesome 4/4 · komorebi 3/4 | ||
| Layout presets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Application rules | ✓ | ✓ |
| Window grouping | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Virtual desktop controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Platforms | linux | Windows, macOS |
| Maximum displays | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | For Linux users who want control over how windows are arranged and managed, awesome is a free, open-source window manager for X. It combines tiling and floating layouts with keyboard-driven operation, multiple-screen support, and… Read the review → |
komorebi is a configuration-driven tiling window manager for Windows and macOS. It is suited to people who want control over window placement, workspaces, and monitor-specific arrangements rather than relying only on manual resizing.… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
awesome — where it wins
- Offers both tiling and floating layouts, with per-screen tags.
- Lua configuration supports application rules and fine-grained window control.
- Includes custom widgets, status bars, and D-Bus support.
Where it doesn't
- Designed for X, rather than a general-purpose desktop environment.
- Lua-based configuration may not suit users seeking a mostly graphical setup.
- The latest stable release listed by the project is version 4.3, dated 28 January 2019.
komorebi — where it wins
- Offers BSP, columns, rows, stacks, grid, and scrolling layouts
- Applies placement and floating rules based on app executable, title, or class
- Supports monitor-specific workspaces and command-line control
Where it doesn't
- Keyboard input requires external hotkey software
- Commercial use requires a recurring individual license
- Configuration-driven controls may not suit users seeking a graphical setup
- awesome9.1/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source X window manager built for keyboard control and deep customization.
Visit awesomeFull verdict → - komorebi8.3/10 · Free plan
A configurable, command-line window manager with free personal use and paid commercial licenses.
Visit komorebiFull verdict →
More comparisons
- i3 vs awesome
- Sway vs awesome
- Hyprland vs awesome
- awesome vs XMonad
- awesome vs dwm
- awesome vs IceWM
- awesome vs Qtile
All window management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




