Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Print Management Software

ApeosWare Management Suite 2 vs PaperCut Pocket

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score ApeosWare Management Suite 2 #1 in Print Management Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request · 60-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Contact FUJIFILM
PaperCut Pocket #9 in Print Management Software 8.1/10 40-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit PaperCut

ApeosWare Management Suite 2 leads on 0 checks, PaperCut Pocket on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApeosWare Management Suite 2 · 9.2/10
  • Free trialboth

ApeosWare Management Suite 2 scores higher on our rubric for print management software: 9.2 against 8.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #9.

On deployment, ApeosWare Management Suite 2 gives you On-premises where PaperCut Pocket offers Cloud. On reporting, ApeosWare Management Suite 2 gives you Advanced where PaperCut Pocket offers Detailed.

ApeosWare Management Suite 2 is the better fit for organizations needing advanced accounting and workflows. PaperCut Pocket is the better fit for small teams seeking low-cost cloud printing.

  • ApeosWare Management Suite 2 fits best

    Organizations needing advanced accounting and workflows

  • PaperCut Pocket fits best

    Small teams seeking low-cost cloud printing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ApeosWare Management Suite 2 9.2/10 Visit ↗ PaperCut Pocket 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.1
Ranking #1 in Print Management Software #9 in Print Management Software
Best for Organizations needing advanced accounting and workflows Small teams seeking low-cost cloud printing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request · 60-day trial $1.77/user/mo
Free plan — —
Free trial 60 days 40 days
Free trial length 60 days 40 days · no card needed
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Support Email Email, Live chat, Phone, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 12 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market
Features ApeosWare Management Suite 2 4/4 · PaperCut Pocket 4/4
Secure release ✓ ✓
Print quotas ✓ ✓
Print policy rules ✓ ✓
Mobile printing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment On-premises Cloud
Reporting Advanced Detailed
Supported platforms Windows; iOS; Android; web browser Windows, macOS, ChromeOS, iOS, Android
Our review
Pros
  • Authenticated release, print policies and budget controls
  • Over 30 accounting report types from job logs
  • Broad document-service integrations plus mobile and web printing
  • Secure release through mobile app, QR code, printer codes, or NFC
  • Automatic printer discovery and print queue deployment
  • Quotas, policy rules, cost tracking, and detailed reporting
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through a sales contact
  • On-premises deployment may not suit cloud-only teams
  • Optional capabilities vary by edition and configuration
  • No free plan is included
  • The 200+ active-user tier requires contacting PaperCut
  • Named integrations are limited to Google Workspace and Microsoft Entra ID
Our verdict

ApeosWare Management Suite 2 manages networked printers and multifunction devices alongside users, authentication, print output, accounting and document distribution. It is suited to small, mid-market and enterprise organizations that need…

Read the review →

PaperCut Pocket is a cloud-based print management service for organizations that want to manage printing without dedicated print servers. It suits small teams that need secure release, print controls, usage visibility, and support for…

Read the review →
  1. ApeosWare Management Suite 2Print Management Software 9.2Pricing on request · 60-day trial
  2. PaperCut PocketPrint Management Software 8.140-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ApeosWare Management Suite 2 — where it wins

    • Authenticated release, print policies and budget controls
    • Over 30 accounting report types from job logs
    • Broad document-service integrations plus mobile and web printing

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through a sales contact
    • On-premises deployment may not suit cloud-only teams
    • Optional capabilities vary by edition and configuration
  • PaperCut Pocket — where it wins

    • Secure release through mobile app, QR code, printer codes, or NFC
    • Automatic printer discovery and print queue deployment
    • Quotas, policy rules, cost tracking, and detailed reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is included
    • The 200+ active-user tier requires contacting PaperCut
    • Named integrations are limited to Google Workspace and Microsoft Entra ID
  • ApeosWare Management Suite 29.2/10 · Pricing on request · 60-day trial

    Advanced print accounting and authenticated workflows for organizations managing networked devices.

    Contact FUJIFILMFull verdict →
  • PaperCut Pocket8.1/10 · 40-day trial

    A low-cost cloud print manager for small teams needing control and visibility.

    Visit PaperCutFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update