Head-to-head · MQTT Broker Software
Apache BifroMQ vs HiveMQ MQTT Broker
Apache BifroMQ leads on 0 checks, HiveMQ MQTT Broker on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreApache BifroMQ · 9.1/10
- Free planboth
- Free trialonly HiveMQ MQTT Broker
- Most featuresApache BifroMQ · 2 of 2
Apache BifroMQ scores higher on our rubric for mqtt broker software: 9.1 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.
Apache BifroMQ is the better fit for teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems. HiveMQ MQTT Broker is the better fit for teams needing managed or self-managed MQTT with QoS 2.
- Apache BifroMQ fits best
Teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems
- HiveMQ MQTT Broker fits best
Teams needing managed or self-managed MQTT with QoS 2
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Apache BifroMQ 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | HiveMQ MQTT Broker 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #3 in MQTT Broker Software | #6 in MQTT Broker Software |
| Best for | Teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems | Teams needing managed or self-managed MQTT with QoS 2 |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | — |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | 15 days |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS | Windows, Linux |
| Support | Community, Docs | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Apache BifroMQ 2/2 · HiveMQ MQTT Broker 0/2 | ||
| Retained messages | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Clustering | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Self-hosted | Not checked yet |
| MQTT versions | 3.1, 3.1.1, 5.0 | Not checked yet |
| Connection limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Authentication methods | AuthProvider plugin; demo WebHook-based AuthProvider | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Apache BifroMQ is an open-source, self-hosted MQTT broker for IoT messaging workloads. It suits teams that want to run broker infrastructure as part of a broader system, including small, mid-market, and enterprise organizations. The… Read the review → |
HiveMQ MQTT Broker connects devices, applications, and enterprise systems through MQTT messaging. It supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5, with QoS 0, 1, and 2, persistent sessions, message queuing, clustering, and security controls. Managed… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Apache BifroMQ — where it wins
- Supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5.0 over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets
- Native tenant isolation with resource sharing and tenant-level throttling
- Distributed storage, clustering, persistent sessions, and retained messages
Where it doesn't
- Requires self-hosted deployment and integration into a broader system
- Authentication and authorization need an AuthProvider plugin configured
- Support channels are community and documentation
HiveMQ MQTT Broker — where it wins
- Supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5 with all three QoS levels
- Offers managed and self-managed deployment options
- Connects with data platforms including Kafka, Kinesis, and Snowflake
Where it doesn't
- Self-managed Lab and Launch plans are limited to one broker deployment
- Listed monthly self-managed plans start at $299
- Several enterprise plan prices depend on custom capacity
- Apache BifroMQ9.1/10 · Free plan
A self-hosted broker with clustering, distributed storage, and support for MQTT 3.1 through 5.0.
Visit Apache BifroMQFull verdict → - HiveMQ MQTT Broker8.8/10 · Free plan · 15-day trial
Flexible managed or self-managed MQTT with QoS 2, clustering, and broad integrations.
Visit HiveMQFull verdict →
Apache BifroMQ vs HiveMQ MQTT Broker: questions
Which is better for MQTT broker software, Apache BifroMQ or HiveMQ MQTT Broker?
Apache BifroMQ scores higher on our rubric for mqtt broker software: 9.1 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.
How do Apache BifroMQ and HiveMQ MQTT Broker compare?
All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.
Do Apache BifroMQ and HiveMQ MQTT Broker have a free plan?
Apache BifroMQ: Yes. HiveMQ MQTT Broker: Yes.
More comparisons
- AWS IoT Core vs Apache BifroMQ
- AWS IoT Core vs HiveMQ MQTT Broker
- Azure Event Grid MQTT broker vs Apache BifroMQ
- Azure Event Grid MQTT broker vs HiveMQ MQTT Broker
- Apache BifroMQ vs Eclipse Amlen
- Apache BifroMQ vs EMQX
- Apache BifroMQ vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Apache BifroMQ vs Cedalo Pro Mosquitto
All MQTT broker software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026
Last updated · How we research and update


