Head-to-head · MQTT Broker Software
Apache BifroMQ vs EMQX
Apache BifroMQ leads on 0 checks, EMQX on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreApache BifroMQ · 9.1/10
- Free planboth
- Free trialonly EMQX
- Most featuresApache BifroMQ · 2 of 2
Apache BifroMQ scores higher on our rubric for mqtt broker software: 9.1 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
Apache BifroMQ is the better fit for teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems. EMQX is the better fit for teams needing MQTT with broad protocol connectivity.
- Apache BifroMQ fits best
Teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems
- EMQX fits best
Teams needing MQTT with broad protocol connectivity
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Apache BifroMQ 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | EMQX 8.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Ranking | #3 in MQTT Broker Software | #5 in MQTT Broker Software |
| Best for | Teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems | Teams needing MQTT with broad protocol connectivity |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | $234/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | 14 days |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Support | Community, Docs | Email, Tickets, Docs |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Apache BifroMQ 2/2 · EMQX 0/2 | ||
| Retained messages | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Clustering | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Self-hosted | Not checked yet |
| MQTT versions | 3.1, 3.1.1, 5.0 | Not checked yet |
| Connection limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Authentication methods | AuthProvider plugin; demo WebHook-based AuthProvider | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Apache BifroMQ is an open-source, self-hosted MQTT broker for IoT messaging workloads. It suits teams that want to run broker infrastructure as part of a broader system, including small, mid-market, and enterprise organizations. The… Read the review → |
EMQX provides MQTT publish/subscribe messaging for IoT, AI, and connected-device workloads. Its mix of managed cloud, bring-your-own-cloud, and self-hosted Enterprise options suits teams that need to connect device fleets or real-time data… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Apache BifroMQ — where it wins
- Supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5.0 over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets
- Native tenant isolation with resource sharing and tenant-level throttling
- Distributed storage, clustering, persistent sessions, and retained messages
Where it doesn't
- Requires self-hosted deployment and integration into a broader system
- Authentication and authorization need an AuthProvider plugin configured
- Support channels are community and documentation
EMQX — where it wins
- Connects MQTT with protocols including CoAP, STOMP, and NATS
- Routes and transforms data with SQL rules and a visual flow designer
- Offers TLS/mTLS, authentication controls, ACL/RBAC, and audit logs
Where it doesn't
- Dedicated Flex starts at $234/month
- Serverless charges for usage beyond its free monthly quota
- Plan, capacity, cloud provider, and region affect pricing
- Apache BifroMQ9.1/10 · Free plan
A self-hosted broker with clustering, distributed storage, and support for MQTT 3.1 through 5.0.
Visit Apache BifroMQFull verdict → - EMQX8.9/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial
A flexible MQTT platform with protocol gateways, durable queues, and cloud or self-hosted options.
Visit EMQXFull verdict →
Apache BifroMQ vs EMQX: questions
Which is better for MQTT broker software, Apache BifroMQ or EMQX?
Apache BifroMQ scores higher on our rubric for mqtt broker software: 9.1 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
How do Apache BifroMQ and EMQX compare?
All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.
Do Apache BifroMQ and EMQX have a free plan?
Apache BifroMQ: Yes. EMQX: Yes.
More comparisons
- AWS IoT Core vs Apache BifroMQ
- AWS IoT Core vs EMQX
- Azure Event Grid MQTT broker vs Apache BifroMQ
- Azure Event Grid MQTT broker vs EMQX
- Apache BifroMQ vs Eclipse Amlen
- Apache BifroMQ vs HiveMQ MQTT Broker
- Apache BifroMQ vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Apache BifroMQ vs Cedalo Pro Mosquitto
All MQTT broker software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026
Last updated · How we research and update


