Head-to-head · MQTT Broker Software
Apache BifroMQ vs Cedalo Pro Mosquitto
Apache BifroMQ leads on 1 check, Cedalo Pro Mosquitto on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreApache BifroMQ · 9.1/10
- Free planonly Apache BifroMQ
- Free trialonly Cedalo Pro Mosquitto
Apache BifroMQ scores higher on our rubric for mqtt broker software: 9.1 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.
Apache BifroMQ offers free plan; Cedalo Pro Mosquitto doesn't.
Apache BifroMQ is the better fit for teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems. Cedalo Pro Mosquitto is the better fit for teams managing Mosquitto across production deployments.
- Apache BifroMQ fits best
Teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems
- Cedalo Pro Mosquitto fits best
Teams managing Mosquitto across production deployments
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Apache BifroMQ 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | Cedalo Pro Mosquitto 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #3 in MQTT Broker Software | #8 in MQTT Broker Software |
| Best for | Teams building self-hosted, clustered MQTT systems | Teams managing Mosquitto across production deployments |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | €39/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | 14 days |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, Windows, macOS, Web |
| Support | Community, Docs | Email · 24/7 |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Apache BifroMQ 2/2 · Cedalo Pro Mosquitto 2/2 | ||
| Retained messages | ✓ | ✓ |
| Clustering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Self-hosted | Not checked yet |
| MQTT versions | 3.1, 3.1.1, 5.0 | 3.1.1, 5.0 |
| Connection limit | Not checked yet | 30 connections |
| Authentication methods | AuthProvider plugin; demo WebHook-based AuthProvider | LDAP, Active Directory, OIDC, OAuth2, RBAC, mTLS, dynamic credentials |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Apache BifroMQ is an open-source, self-hosted MQTT broker for IoT messaging workloads. It suits teams that want to run broker infrastructure as part of a broader system, including small, mid-market, and enterprise organizations. The… Read the review → |
Cedalo Pro Mosquitto extends Eclipse Mosquitto for organizations running IoT and industrial messaging in production. It suits teams that need managed broker administration alongside MQTT 3.1.1 and MQTT 5.0 support, including deployments… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Apache BifroMQ — where it wins
- Supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5.0 over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets
- Native tenant isolation with resource sharing and tenant-level throttling
- Distributed storage, clustering, persistent sessions, and retained messages
Where it doesn't
- Requires self-hosted deployment and integration into a broader system
- Authentication and authorization need an AuthProvider plugin configured
- Support channels are community and documentation
Cedalo Pro Mosquitto — where it wins
- Supports MQTT 3.1.1 and MQTT 5.0 with active-passive and active-active clustering
- Disk-backed queues, audit logs and per-topic access controls support operations
- Management Center monitoring, REST API and broad identity integrations
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; the S cloud plan starts at €39/month billed annually
- The listed S and M plans are cloud plans; Enterprise has an individual HA setup
- Its added administration features may be unnecessary for simpler broker needs
- Apache BifroMQ9.1/10 · Free plan
A self-hosted broker with clustering, distributed storage, and support for MQTT 3.1 through 5.0.
Visit Apache BifroMQFull verdict → - Cedalo Pro Mosquitto8.6/10 · 14-day trial
Managed Mosquitto adds clustering, persistent queues and centralized administration.
Visit CedaloFull verdict →
Apache BifroMQ vs Cedalo Pro Mosquitto: questions
Which is better for MQTT broker software, Apache BifroMQ or Cedalo Pro Mosquitto?
Apache BifroMQ scores higher on our rubric for mqtt broker software: 9.1 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.
How do Apache BifroMQ and Cedalo Pro Mosquitto compare?
Of the 3 checks we put side by side, Apache BifroMQ leads on 1, Cedalo Pro Mosquitto on none, and 2 are level. Free plan only on Apache BifroMQ.
Do Apache BifroMQ and Cedalo Pro Mosquitto have a free plan?
Apache BifroMQ: Yes. Cedalo Pro Mosquitto: No.
More comparisons
- AWS IoT Core vs Apache BifroMQ
- AWS IoT Core vs Cedalo Pro Mosquitto
- Azure Event Grid MQTT broker vs Apache BifroMQ
- Azure Event Grid MQTT broker vs Cedalo Pro Mosquitto
- Apache BifroMQ vs Eclipse Amlen
- Apache BifroMQ vs EMQX
- Apache BifroMQ vs HiveMQ MQTT Broker
- Apache BifroMQ vs Eclipse Mosquitto
All MQTT broker software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026
Last updated · How we research and update


