Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Container Registries

Angos vs Amazon Elastic Container Registry

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Angos #5 in Container Registries 9.0/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Angos

Angos leads on 0 checks, Amazon Elastic Container Registry on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAngos · 9.0/10

Angos scores higher on our rubric for container registries: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Angos is the better fit for policy-driven open-source deployments. Amazon Elastic Container Registry is the better fit for AWS-native container workloads.

  • Angos fits best

    Policy-driven open-source deployments

  • Amazon Elastic Container Registry fits best

    AWS-native container workloads

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Angos 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Amazon Elastic Container Registry 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #5 in Container Registries #7 in Container Registries
Best for Policy-driven open-source deployments AWS-native container workloads
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Open source $0.10/GB/mo
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Angos 4/4 · Amazon Elastic Container Registry 4/4
Image scanning ✓ ✓
OCI artifacts ✓ ✓
Immutable tags ✓ ✓
Retention policies ✓ ✓
Specs
Replication scope Not checked yet Multi-region
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum image size Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • CEL policies cover access control, retention, and pruning
  • Supports immutable tags, replication, and pull-through caching
  • Works with OIDC, mTLS, Trivy, Grype, and S3-compatible storage
  • Deep integration with ECS, EKS, Fargate, Lambda, and Elastic Beanstalk
  • Scanning, immutable tags, lifecycle policies, signing, and encrypted storage
  • Cross-Region and cross-account replication with pull-through caching
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the registry environment
  • Vulnerability scanning depends on an external Trivy or Grype service
  • Not positioned as a hosted registry with managed operations
  • Usage-based pricing requires cost planning rather than fixed subscription budgeting
  • Its strongest fit is within the AWS ecosystem
  • The 52,000 MiB layer limit may matter for unusually large layers
Our verdict

Angos is an open-source, self-hosted container registry for development, CI/CD, and infrastructure teams distributing Docker-compatible and OCI images. It supports the OCI Distribution Specification v1.1 and can store images on a…

Read the review →

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR) is a fully managed registry for Docker and Open Container Initiative images and artifacts. It supports private and public repositories, with access through the web, APIs, Docker-compatible…

Read the review →
  1. AngosContainer Registries 9.0Open source
  2. Amazon Elastic Container RegistryContainer Registries 8.8Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Angos — where it wins

    • CEL policies cover access control, retention, and pruning
    • Supports immutable tags, replication, and pull-through caching
    • Works with OIDC, mTLS, Trivy, Grype, and S3-compatible storage

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the registry environment
    • Vulnerability scanning depends on an external Trivy or Grype service
    • Not positioned as a hosted registry with managed operations
  • Amazon Elastic Container Registry — where it wins

    • Deep integration with ECS, EKS, Fargate, Lambda, and Elastic Beanstalk
    • Scanning, immutable tags, lifecycle policies, signing, and encrypted storage
    • Cross-Region and cross-account replication with pull-through caching

    Where it doesn't

    • Usage-based pricing requires cost planning rather than fixed subscription budgeting
    • Its strongest fit is within the AWS ecosystem
    • The 52,000 MiB layer limit may matter for unusually large layers
  • Angos9.0/10 · Open source

    An open-source registry for teams that need policy controls, caching, replication, and self-hosting.

    Visit AngosFull verdict →
  • Amazon Elastic Container Registry8.8/10 · Paid

    A capable AWS-native registry with strong controls, scanning, and multi-Region support.

    Visit Amazon ECRFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update