Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Container Registries

Zot Registry vs Angos

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Zot Registry #4 in Container Registries 9.1/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Zot Registry
Angos #5 in Container Registries 9.0/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Angos

Zot Registry leads on 0 checks, Angos on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreZot Registry · 9.1/10

Zot Registry scores higher on our rubric for container registries: 9.1 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

Zot Registry is the better fit for self-hosted teams needing scalable OCI features. Angos is the better fit for policy-driven open-source deployments.

  • Zot Registry fits best

    Self-hosted teams needing scalable OCI features

  • Angos fits best

    Policy-driven open-source deployments

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Zot Registry 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Angos 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 9.0
Ranking #4 in Container Registries #5 in Container Registries
Best for Self-hosted teams needing scalable OCI features Policy-driven open-source deployments
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Open source Open source
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux Linux
Support Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Zot Registry 4/4 · Angos 4/4
Image scanning ✓ ✓
OCI artifacts ✓ ✓
Immutable tags ✓ ✓
Retention policies ✓ ✓
Specs
Replication scope Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum image size Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports OCI images, artifacts, Helm charts, and standard registry clients
  • Adds Trivy scanning, retention policies, and immutable tag protection
  • Offers mirroring, multiple storage backends, clustering, and garbage collection
  • CEL policies cover access control, retention, and pruning
  • Supports immutable tags, replication, and pull-through caching
  • Works with OIDC, mTLS, Trivy, Grype, and S3-compatible storage
Cons
  • Requires teams to operate it as self-hosted software
  • Clustering uses stateless replicas with shared remote storage
  • Vulnerability scanning is focused on stored images through Trivy
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the registry environment
  • Vulnerability scanning depends on an external Trivy or Grype service
  • Not positioned as a hosted registry with managed operations
Our verdict

Zot Registry is an open-source, vendor-neutral registry for storing and distributing container images and other OCI artifacts. It implements the OCI Distribution Specification and runs as self-hosted software on Linux or macOS. Its…

Read the review →

Angos is an open-source, self-hosted container registry for development, CI/CD, and infrastructure teams distributing Docker-compatible and OCI images. It supports the OCI Distribution Specification v1.1 and can store images on a…

Read the review →
  1. Zot RegistryContainer Registries 9.1Open source
  2. AngosContainer Registries 9.0Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Zot Registry — where it wins

    • Supports OCI images, artifacts, Helm charts, and standard registry clients
    • Adds Trivy scanning, retention policies, and immutable tag protection
    • Offers mirroring, multiple storage backends, clustering, and garbage collection

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires teams to operate it as self-hosted software
    • Clustering uses stateless replicas with shared remote storage
    • Vulnerability scanning is focused on stored images through Trivy
  • Angos — where it wins

    • CEL policies cover access control, retention, and pruning
    • Supports immutable tags, replication, and pull-through caching
    • Works with OIDC, mTLS, Trivy, Grype, and S3-compatible storage

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the registry environment
    • Vulnerability scanning depends on an external Trivy or Grype service
    • Not positioned as a hosted registry with managed operations

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update