ALICE vs Mastt Schedule

ALICE8.8Visit Mastt Schedule8.5Visit

Higher score ALICE #4 in Construction Scheduling Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit ALICE

vs

Mastt Schedule #7 in Construction Scheduling Software 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Mastt Schedule

• ALICE fits best

  Large teams using AI scenario planning

• Mastt Schedule fits best

  Small construction teams wanting free entry

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	ALICE 8.8/10 Visit ↗	Mastt Schedule 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.8	8.5
Ranking	#4 in Construction Scheduling Software	#7 in Construction Scheduling Software
Best for	Large teams using AI scenario planning	Small construction teams wanting free entry
Pricing model	Paid	Free plan + paid
Starting price	Pricing on request	$165/mo
Free plan	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Community, Docs, Tickets	Email, Phone, Docs
Compliance	SOC 2, SSO/SAML	SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations	3 integrations	2 integrations
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ALICE 3/4 · Mastt Schedule 2/4
Critical path	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Gantt charts	✓	✓
Resource planning	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Schedule templates	—	✓ (best)
Specs
Mobile apps	Not checked yet	None
Project limit	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	AI-generated what-if scenarios support schedule optimization Gantt, longest-path, and resource planning in one platform Imports and exports schedules for P6 and Microsoft Project	Free Starter plan supports unlimited users and budgets Imports Microsoft Project XML and Primavera P6 XER files Baselines, slip/gain tracking, templates, and PDF exports
Cons	Pricing is contact-sales rather than publicly itemized Web platform only No schedule templates are listed among its category capabilities	Professional costs $165 per project per month Available on the web only, with no mobile apps Critical-path calculation and resource planning are not specified
Our verdict	ALICE is an AI-powered construction scheduling and optioneering platform from ALICE Technologies. It is designed for general contractors, owners, and consultants managing large capital construction projects. Teams can create, import,… Read the review →	Mastt Schedule is a browser-based construction scheduling module for project owners, consultants, program managers, and construction teams. It covers activities, phases, milestones, dependencies, baselines, and progress reporting, with… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• ALICE — where it wins

  • AI-generated what-if scenarios support schedule optimization
  • Gantt, longest-path, and resource planning in one platform
  • Imports and exports schedules for P6 and Microsoft Project

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing is contact-sales rather than publicly itemized
  • Web platform only
  • No schedule templates are listed among its category capabilities

• Mastt Schedule — where it wins

  • Free Starter plan supports unlimited users and budgets
  • Imports Microsoft Project XML and Primavera P6 XER files
  • Baselines, slip/gain tracking, templates, and PDF exports

  Where it doesn't

  • Professional costs $165 per project per month
  • Available on the web only, with no mobile apps
  • Critical-path calculation and resource planning are not specified

• ALICE8.8/10 · Pricing on request

  A construction scheduling platform for teams comparing complex project scenarios.

  Visit ALICEFull verdict →
• Mastt Schedule8.5/10 · Free plan

  A focused web scheduler with free entry and strong construction schedule controls.

  Visit Mastt ScheduleFull verdict →