Recommended Free Tools
The AWS Start-Up Challenge was Amazon Web Services’ fourth annual startup competition, announced in August 2010. It rewarded privately held companies and individuals building products on AWS, combining cash, AWS credits, technical support, mentorship and a possible investment opportunity. The 2010 contest added regional winners in the Americas, Asia Pacific and Europe before a global final.
What the AWS Start-Up Challenge was
AWS presented the challenge as a way to recognize innovative startups built on cloud computing. The fourth annual contest was announced on 18 August 2010 and covered products that used AWS infrastructure, including services such as Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3. A contemporaneous Data Center Knowledge report published on 19 August 2010 described the competition and its regional-to-global structure.
What winners could receive
| Stage | Benefit | Qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Regional semi-finalist | $2,500 in AWS service credits | AWS-published 2010 prize terms |
| Global finalist | $10,000 in AWS service credits plus travel to Palo Alto for final judging | AWS-published 2010 prize terms |
| Global grand prize | $50,000 cash, $50,000 in AWS service credits, premium support, one year of technical mentorship and a possible investment offer from Amazon | AWS-published 2010 prize terms; the investment was described as a possibility, not a guaranteed award |
The package was notable because it mixed unrestricted cash with infrastructure credits and operational help. AWS credits reduced hosting costs, while premium support and mentorship addressed the technical and scaling problems that commonly constrain young companies.
Who was eligible in 2010
The rules imposed both organizational and financial limits:
#1 Best Overall
- The entrant had to be a privately held company or an individual legally based in one of the countries listed in the official rules.
- The submission had to use AWS services, such as Amazon EC2 or Amazon S3.
- Annual revenue could not exceed $10 million.
- Outside funding could not exceed $10 million.
Those limits targeted early-stage businesses rather than established vendors. Because the country list and contest rules belonged to the 2010 edition, they should not be treated as current AWS eligibility requirements.
How AWS judges evaluated entries
AWS’s criteria balanced engineering with commercial potential:
Rank #2
- AWS implementation: how the product used AWS services.
- Originality and creativity: whether the idea and execution were distinctive.
- Long-term success and scalability: whether the company could grow technically and commercially.
- Market need: whether the product addressed a real customer or industry problem.
This meant a technically sophisticated deployment was not enough by itself. Entrants also had to show why the product mattered and how its business could scale.
What participants said about the impact
GoodData’s validation story
GoodData CEO Roman Stanek later described the win as “a watershed for GoodData.” He said it validated the cloud as a technically feasible and economically disruptive way to deliver business intelligence and connected the company with AWS startups and developers. He also said, “We were born in the cloud – similar to a lot of other cloud companies, we couldn’t have built our business without AWS.”
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Rank #3
MileMeter’s account of survival
MileMeter founder and CEO Chris Gay gave a more urgent account. He said the company was preparing to shut down when AWS contacted him to say that, from 900 promising startups, MileMeter was a finalist for the first AWS Start-Up Challenge. His statement that the challenge “literally saved our business” is the founder’s retrospective description, not an independently measured outcome, but it illustrates the potential value of recognition, financing and access at a critical moment.
How to compare the challenge with another startup competition
Use the following dimensions rather than comparing headline prize money alone:
Rank #4
- Technical requirement: determine whether the competition requires use of a particular cloud or technology stack.
- Prize composition: separate cash from credits, discounts and services that can only be spent with the sponsor.
- Geographic scope: check whether eligibility is global, regional or limited to named countries.
- Company maturity: compare revenue and funding caps, incorporation rules and ownership requirements.
- Judging model: look for explicit scoring around scalability, originality and market need.
- Post-contest support: identify support, mentorship, travel, investor access and any conditions attached to them.
Is there an AWS challenge you can apply to now?
The 2010 Start-Up Challenge is a historical contest and its rules and prizes are not current application guidance. AWS has since promoted startup-support initiatives, including AWS Activate, but eligibility, credit amounts and availability change. Anyone considering a present-day application should verify the active terms directly with AWS rather than assuming that the 2010 $50,000 cash award, credit amounts or mentorship package still exists.
The enduring lesson is narrower and more useful: AWS designed the contest for startups whose product, architecture and business case were all credible. Cloud usage was an entry requirement, while scalability and market need helped determine who advanced.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

