Artifact Repository Software: ranks 51–63
Page 2 of 2 of the full artifact repository software ranking. Every tool here is researched from its official pricing and product pages. See our top picks →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Ranks 51–63 of 63 tools, best first
-
Best forTeams publishing signed Debian and RPM feeds
A focused open-source choice for signed Debian and RPM feeds.
- Retention rules
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Pigsty -
Best forSelf-hosted Composer repository management
A focused self-hosted repository for teams distributing PHP packages through Composer.
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Packistry -
Best forDebian and Ubuntu repository publishing
A focused open-source choice for publishing Debian and Ubuntu APT repositories.
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Attune -
Best forPaid self-hosted multi-format registries
A paid, self-hosted registry spanning ten artifact formats and multiple registry modes.
- Container artifacts
- Upstream proxying
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Omni Line -
Best forRuby teams hosting private gems
A focused, open-source registry for teams hosting private Ruby gems themselves.
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Geminabox -
Best forSmall teams serving private Python packages
A focused private Python package index for teams that want simple self-hosting.
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit pypiserver -
Best forPrivate Ruby gem caching and hosting
A focused open-source repository server for caching and hosting Ruby gems.
- Upstream proxying
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Gemstash -
Best forNix teams running binary caches
A focused, open-source Nix cache for teams serving built artifacts from their own infrastructure.
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Harmonia -
Best forCI teams needing build artifact storage
A CI-focused option for teams storing artifacts alongside builds, tests, and deployments.
5.8/10★★★☆☆Visit Buildkite -
Best forPython data science and AI projects
A capable cloud notebook environment, but not a fit for artifact repository needs.
4.5/10★★☆☆☆Visit Anaconda -
Best forOrganizations managing governed documents
A governed content platform with strong document controls, not a dedicated artifact repository.
1.2/10★☆☆☆☆Visit Oracle -
Best forAzure DevOps teams managing software testing
A focused test-management service, not an artifact repository.
Free plan · paid from $52/user/mo · 30-day trial Our Azure Test Plans verdict → Try Azure Test Plans0.4/10☆☆☆☆☆Try Azure Test Plans -
Best forOracle IAM MFA users, not artifact teams
A free authentication app, but not an artifact repository or package distribution tool.
0.4/10☆☆☆☆☆Visit Oracle
No tools match those filters.
Compare at a glance
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Included storage | Supported formats | Upstream proxying | Access control | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | SOW | — | None | — | — | — | — | 6.0 |
| 52 | Packistry | — | None | — | — | — | Role-based | 6.0 |
| 53 | Attune | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | 6.0 |
| 54 | Omni Line Multipurpose Artifact Registry | No | $2,499/yr | — | 10 | Yes | Fine-grained | 6.0 |
| 55 | Geminabox | Yes | None | — | — | No | Basic | 6.0 |
| 56 | pypiserver | — | None | — | — | No | Basic | 6.0 |
| 57 | Gemstash | — | None | — | — | Yes | Fine-grained | 6.0 |
| 58 | Harmonia | — | None | — | — | — | — | 6.0 |
| 59 | Buildkite | Yes | $0/unit usage-based | — | — | — | — | 5.8 |
| 60 | Anaconda Notebooks | Yes | $15/user/mo | 10 GB | — | — | — | 4.5 |
| 61 | Oracle WebCenter Content | No | — | — | — | — | — | 1.2 |
| 62 | Azure Test Plans | Yes | $52/user/mo | — | — | — | — | 0.4 |
| 63 | Oracle Mobile Authenticator | Yes | None | — | — | — | — | 0.4 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update