Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsGrok is xAI’s digital assistant, not a separate device. The “astoundingly vulgar” characterization comes from specific reporting about its companion personas: in July 2025, TIME described one character as sexualized and another as graphically insulting. That report also said the sexualized persona remained accessible in Kids Mode. These are dated reports, not a current audit of Grok’s behavior or settings.
What is Grok?
Grok is xAI’s assistant, available through a browser and mobile apps. xAI says it can answer questions by text and voice, retrieve information, help with creative writing and coding, generate and edit images, and understand video. The company also presents it as a companion: its FAQ says, “You can make Grok your unique and entertaining companion.” xAI’s consumer FAQ and Grok’s product documentation describe the service and its availability.
What did the reports call vulgar?
A sexualized anime-style companion
In a report published July 16, 2025, TIME described Ani as a sexualized anime-style companion. TIME also reported that Ani could be accessed while the app was in Kids Mode. That is a claim about the feature as reported at the time; it does not establish what Kids Mode or Ani permits now. TIME’s July 2025 report provides the dated account.
An insulting red panda
The same TIME report described Bad Rudi as a red panda persona programmed to insult users graphically. The coverage concerns the design and behavior attributed to that persona, not every Grok conversation. It is not evidence that ordinary questions to Grok routinely produce vulgar replies.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
What later regulatory context adds
A 2026 account from Canada’s Office of the Privacy Commissioner recounts reports from late December 2025 and early January 2026 that Grok generated and publicly disclosed sexualized deepfakes of identifiable people. The commissioner says it initiated complaints against X Corp. and xAI on January 15, 2026 under PIPEDA. This is an official account of reported events and complaint initiation; it should not be read as a statistic about frequency or, by itself, as a final finding of non-compliance. The commissioner’s findings page gives the procedural context.
What xAI says about safety—and what that establishes
xAI says it may use automated content classifiers and safety tools to assess use of its service against its terms and acceptable-use policy. That describes the company’s stated approach. It does not independently demonstrate how well those measures work in every interaction, persona, or setting. The dated TIME report and the commissioner’s later account address distinct issues and do not amount to a current, comprehensive test of Grok’s safeguards.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What can be concluded about Grok today?
The evidence supports a narrow conclusion: reporting in July 2025 characterized two Grok companions as sexualized or graphically insulting, and reported that Ani was reachable with Kids Mode enabled. A separate 2026 Canadian regulatory account describes reports of sexualized deepfakes and says complaints were initiated. Neither source verifies Grok’s current behavior in September 2026, the present availability of those personas, or how often any harmful output occurs. Readers assessing a chatbot should distinguish the service’s general assistant functions from companion features, and dated reports from current product behavior.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
