What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Data centers could require less land, power and equipment to produce a given amount of computing in the years ahead. That would not necessarily mean fewer data centers or less total electricity use: more efficient, cheaper computing could also encourage much greater demand. The distinction matters when communities and investors weigh the costs and long-term value of new infrastructure.

What does it mean for the data center boom to shrink?

It means the infrastructure required for a given quantity of computing may get smaller or more efficient—not that total computing demand is certain to fall. In an October 6, 2026, opinion essay, Todd G. Buchholz asks what a data center will look like in 10 or 20 years, and how much land, electricity and equipment will be needed to produce a unit of computing.

Buchholz points to more efficient chips, stacked chips, better cooling and leaner software as possible ways to reduce infrastructure intensity. These are reasons to question whether today’s facilities will retain their current scale and configuration over the long term, not proof of a particular future footprint.

His historical contrast is ENIAC: Buchholz writes that the 1946 computer weighed 30 tons, could fill a house and used 140 kilowatts for arithmetic. The example illustrates how computing hardware can change radically; it does not by itself predict the size or energy use of future AI infrastructure.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
#1 Best Overall
Sale
Tecmojo 6U Wall Mount Server Cabinet IT Network Rack Enclosure Lockable Door and Side Panels Black, Cooling Fan, Standard Glass Door, 450mm Depth, for 19” IT Equipment, A/V Devices
  • Save valuable floor space: 6U wall mount server cabinet Dimensions: 13.78" H x21.65" W x17.72" D.Maximum mounting depth is 14.2"
  • Keep critical network equipment secure: glass door and side panels are lockable to prevent unauthorized access. Front door can be installed on either side of the front of the cabinet to satisfy your door swing orientation preference
  • Easy equipment configuration: Fully adjustable mounting rails and numbered U positions, with square holes for easy equipment mounting with top and bottom punch-out panels for easy cable access
  • Durability: Made of high quality cold rolled steel holds up to 110lb (50kg) (Easy Assembly Required)
  • PCI & HIPPA and EIA/ECA-310-E compliant

Why efficiency may not reduce total electricity use

Efficiency lowers the resources needed for each unit of computing. But if it also makes computing cheaper, people and businesses may use far more of it. This is the Jevons effect: efficiency can spur enough additional use to increase total resource consumption.

Applied to AI, that leaves two outcomes possible at once: infrastructure intensity per unit of computing could fall while total computing—and the energy needed to serve it—rises. Buchholz puts it this way: “Two apparently contradictory things can therefore happen at once: The world can consume vastly more computing while requiring less infrastructure for each computing unit.” His essay does not quantify whether efficiency or increased demand will dominate.

What the Ohio project example does—and does not—show

Buchholz describes a developing Ohio campus backed by SoftBank, with commitments from OpenAI and Nvidia, planned power capacity of 10 gigawatts and long-term contracts. That is an account of plans and commitments, not evidence that the full capacity will be built, connected to the grid or used.

The example raises a practical question for large projects: who bears the cost if utilities expand generation or transmission for a major customer and the expected demand does not materialize? Buchholz warns that households could be left paying for infrastructure built for that customer. He frames this as a bad contract, not an inevitable consequence of computing or data-center growth.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Rank #2
Tecmojo 12U Wall Mount Server Cabinet IT Network Rack Enclosure Lockable Door and Side Panels Black,Cooling Fan,Glass Door,17.7inch Depth,for 19” IT Equipment,A/V Devices
  • Save valuable floor space: 12U wall mount server cabinet Dimensions: 24.25" H x21.65" W x17.72" D. MAXIMUM MOUNTING DEPTH is 14.2".
  • Keep critical network equipment secure: glass door and side panels are lockable to prevent unauthorized access; Front door can be installed on either side of the front of the cabinet to satisfy your door swing orientation preference
  • Easy equipment configuration: Fully adjustable mounting rails and numbered U positions, with square holes for easy equipment mounting with top and bottom punchout panels for easy cable access
  • Durability: Made of high quality cold rolled steel holds up to 110lb (50kg) (Easy Assembly Required)
  • PCI & HIPPA and EIA/ECA-310-E compliant

What the reported electricity-price finding means

Buchholz summarizes a June study by the Electric Power Research Institute as finding that data-center growth from 2015 to 2024 modestly reduced U.S. residential electricity prices. The reported explanation is that large, steady customers spread fixed grid costs across more kilowatt-hours.

The underlying study is not available here for independent assessment, and the essay’s summary does not establish a general causal rule. Whether households benefit depends on how utilities plan and allocate costs, including whether large customers pay for the upgrades they require.

What communities and investors should examine

The essay’s central investment point is that a data center’s useful life may not match the life of every asset inside it. Buchholz argues that grid access, transmission access, contracted power and fiber may outlast aging chips or a building shell. That is an investment thesis, not a guaranteed valuation outcome.

Before treating a proposed facility as a durable asset—or approving its costs—communities, utilities and investors can test the assumptions that determine who benefits and who carries the risk:

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Rank #3
Tecmojo 4U Wall Mount Rack,4U Rack 14 inch Depth,19" Network Rack for Shallow Server and IT Equipment, Network Switches,Patch Panel Bracket,110lbs(50kg) Weight Capacity,Black
  • Sturdy:4u server rack is construct from cold rolled steel, with a weight capacity of 110lbs(50kg); Electrostatic powder coat prevents rust and corrosion,quality finish
  • Direct use:Open and use, not having to assemble it.Network rack can be placed flat or mounted on the wall,also can be installed vertically under the table
  • Design Features:maximum mounting depth of 14 in,cables can be fixed on the side panel;Open frame server rack achieves effortless inspection, replacement and assemble
  • Installation:wall mount network rack is easy to install,with instructions or videos for reference;Equipped with multiple accessories, suitable for different needs
  • Application:EIA/ECA-310-E Compliant;wall mounted 4u rack fits all 19" racks and cabinets to hold various IT, network, and AV equipment;wall mount rack available in 4U, 6U, and 8U to choose
  • Power and grid upgrades: What capacity is actually contracted, who pays for generation and transmission work, and who bears costs if demand falls short?
  • Water and operating costs: What demands will the facility place on local water resources and the grid over time?
  • Infrastructure intensity: How much computing output is expected per unit of land and electricity, and how might that change as chips, cooling and software improve?
  • Hardware obsolescence: How exposed is the investment to accelerators and other equipment that may lose value faster than the site’s power or fiber connections?
  • Alternative use: If the building or computing equipment becomes less useful, could grid, transmission or fiber access retain value for another use?

These are decision questions, not a ranking of facilities. Their answers depend on project contracts, local infrastructure and how technology and demand develop.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What the headline does not prove

“The data center boom will shrink” is Buchholz’s opinion thesis, not an established forecast. The case for less infrastructure per unit of computing does not establish that total data-center demand, land use or electricity consumption will decline. Those totals will also depend on how quickly AI and other computing uses grow, and whether efficiency gains offset the resulting demand.

For long-term decisions, the useful takeaway is not to assume either permanent expansion or imminent contraction. It is to examine who pays for infrastructure, whether contracts protect ratepayers, and which assets could remain useful if computing hardware or facility designs change.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.