Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →ReviewBench is an offline benchmark for comparing AI code review agents on a shared set of real pull requests. It measures what agents find and miss, and lets teams compare precision and recall using both a fixed gold set and judgments of newly surfaced findings. GitHub announced the benchmark on October 5, 2026, with a 219-pull-request corpus and a research-preview submission workflow.
What ReviewBench evaluates
ReviewBench tests code reviewers against a common set of pull requests using the same scoring methodology. Its purpose is to make comparisons more consistent: teams can examine which defects an agent catches, which it misses, and how much noise it generates. GitHub describes the benchmark as an offline evaluation; it is not a guarantee that a reviewer will produce the same results or user impact in a live development workflow.
GitHub’s announced dataset contains 219 pull requests from 187 public repositories with open-source licenses, covering 19 programming languages. To characterize its workload, GitHub says it analyzed 103.9 million GitHub pull requests. It describes the language and repository-size distributions in the benchmark as closely matching GitHub overall, but it deliberately shifts pull-request size toward the reviewable middle and tail. That means fewer tiny, single-file changes and a greater representation of substantive, multi-file cases than a simple mirror of all pull requests would provide. These corpus details are GitHub’s description of its benchmark, not an independent audit of representativeness. GitHub’s announcement
How the gold set is built
A benchmark needs a reference set of worthwhile findings, but no single reviewer can be assumed to find every valid issue. ReviewBench therefore combines several sources of candidate findings:
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
- Issues raised in real human reviews.
- Issues inferred from changes authors made in follow-up commits.
- Findings from deterministic analysis tools.
- Findings from multiple frontier large language models across model families.
Overlapping findings are semantically deduplicated, then assessed under a shared rubric. A finding counts as a true positive only when it is true, relevant, and non-trivial. GitHub identifies Claude Sonnet 5 as the LLM grader and says the rubric and judge are published. It also says the dataset, judge, and matcher are versioned to support reproducibility. Because a model acts as judge, consistent scoring does not remove the need to examine the rubric, judge configuration, matcher, and version when interpreting a result. GitHub’s announcement
Findings can also be analyzed by severity and category. GitHub lists critical, medium, and low severity, and gives correctness, security, reliability, maintainability, and testing as category examples. These examples should not be read as an exhaustive taxonomy.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
How ReviewBench scores agents
ReviewBench reports precision, recall, and F1 in two scoring modes. Precision indicates how much of an agent’s output is judged valid; recall indicates how much of the reference findings it catches. F1 combines precision and recall. GitHub also describes an adjustable Fβ score, which lets readers give more weight to recall or precision when re-ranking results.
| Metric family | What is evaluated | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Grounded | Findings compared against the fixed, known gold-set labels. | Provides a common basis for comparing systems on known findings. GitHub uses grounded recall as its headline cross-system comparison. |
| Augmented | Unmatched findings are independently judged, so valid issues absent from the original gold set can receive credit. | Useful as an additional per-system diagnostic. Augmented recall’s denominator can grow as an agent surfaces new findings, making it less stable for direct cross-system comparison. |
There is no universally best precision-recall balance. A team that wants fewer distracting comments may prioritize precision; a team more concerned about overlooked defects may prioritize recall. The Fβ weighting can reflect that preference, but comparisons are meaningful only when the dataset, judge, matcher, and run configuration are aligned.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Raw comment volume alone is not a quality measure. For a useful comparison, inspect the severity and category breakdowns alongside precision and recall: an agent that produces more comments may find more consequential issues, produce more low-value noise, or do both.
What GitHub’s validation and production figures show
GitHub reports 96.6% agreement between ReviewBench judgments and an independent audit by senior engineers. The comparison was between the benchmark’s true/false-positive judgments and the engineers’ judgments of those same findings. This is a validation result reported by the benchmark’s owner; it does not establish that every score is correct or that an outside organization has independently replicated the benchmark.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
GitHub also reports one internal multi-model ensemble experiment in which offline ReviewBench predictions aligned directionally with a later production A/B test. Relative to the production control, GitHub says the experiment increased online addressed rate by 8.0%, increased recall by 13.6%, increased comment volume by 61%, and reduced cost per review by 8.0%. For critical comments, GitHub says ReviewBench predicted a 227% increase and the online experiment measured 262%.
These are GitHub-reported results from one example, not benchmark-wide findings or independently replicated outcomes. In GitHub’s definition, addressed rate is the percentage of Copilot code review comments that an LLM determines prompted a corresponding developer code change, using the diff, thread, reactions, resolution state, and post-review code. GitHub says recall measures how much additional human review is still needed. The company cautions that “Online experiments remain the ultimate measure of user impact.” An offline result can help decide what to test, but it cannot establish that a change will benefit every team or code-review system. GitHub’s announcement
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteBest Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
How to submit an agent
GitHub’s October 5, 2026 announcement describes ReviewBench as a research preview. Its stated workflow is:
- Sign in to the ReviewBench website with GitHub.
- Register an agent by providing a container image, configuration, and your model key.
- Iterate on a 25-PR test set with per-pull-request detail.
- Run the full 219-PR set, which the announcement says is evaluated in three rounds.
- Wait for a maintainer to review and approve the submission. Scores remain private until approval; leaderboard results are published only if they beat the agent’s current score or are its first leaderboard entry.
Those site and leaderboard details are the workflow described in GitHub’s announcement; availability and interface labels may change. Check GitHub’s current ReviewBench page before preparing a submission. The announcement says ReviewBench provides the judge, so submitters should use the published evaluation versions and configuration when comparing their result with other entries. GitHub’s announcement
How teams should use the results
ReviewBench is most useful as a controlled comparison and a way to choose what to validate next. A team can run its own reviewer, review per-PR findings, and identify whether a change improves the balance it values. Before treating leaderboard position as a deployment decision, check:
- Whether the results use the same dataset, judge, matcher, and run configuration.
- Grounded precision and recall, rather than a single aggregate score alone.
- Performance by severity and category, especially for the kinds of issues relevant to the codebase.
- Whether augmented findings add useful coverage or mainly change the comparison through a larger set of judged discoveries.
- Whether a promising offline result holds up in a live trial with the team’s own workflow and success measures.
GitHub says it evaluated Copilot code review with ReviewBench, but that fact alone does not show that Copilot or any other agent is best for a particular repository. The corpus is limited to 219 pull requests, and its deliberate size weighting favors more reviewable changes. Results should therefore inform further evaluation, not substitute for it.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
