write-good

At a glance

• Editor score
  6.4 / 10
• Pricing
  Open source
• Best for
  Developers needing lightweight prose linting
• Paid from
  Free
• Facts checked
  20 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • JavaScript API returns suggestions with positions and explanations
  • Checks passive voice, wordiness, clichés, weasel words, and adverbs
  • Configurable checks, whitelist support, custom extensions, and Docker execution

• Where it doesn't

  • Focused on suggestions rather than enforced rule actions
  • No integrations beyond its CLI and JavaScript API
  • Lacks broader governance features for larger writing programs

Our verdict on write-good

write-good is an open-source JavaScript and command-line linter for English prose, aimed at developers who want automated writing checks in development workflows. It can operate as a Node.js module or local CLI, with checks covering passive voice, repeated words, weasel words, adverbs, wordiness, clichés, sentence openings, lexical illusions, and E-Prime usage. Its MIT License and self-hosted model suit teams that prefer a lightweight tool they can run within their own development environment.

The product’s strongest feature is the breadth of its focused prose checks without moving beyond a developer-oriented linting model. The JavaScript API returns suggestions with positions and explanations, while the CLI supports files and globs. Checks can be configured, terms can be added to a whitelist, and custom language-check extensions can expand the rule set. Optional E-Prime checking gives the tool an additional editing mode for teams that follow that style. Docker-based execution also provides another way to run it in a local workflow.

write-good is a practical choice when prose review needs to sit close to code, scripts, or documentation workflows. Its open-source distribution, CLI, API access, and self-hosted operation make it a fit for developers who want direct control over execution and configuration. The trade-off is its narrow focus: the published positioning centers on prose suggestions, while broader integrations and governance features are outside its scope. Teams seeking a lightweight linter should consider write-good; organizations needing a wider writing-quality program may prefer a product with a broader ecosystem and administrative feature set.

Your product? Our editors can test write-good in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

write-good pricing

write-good fact sheet

Alternatives to write-good

• AcrolinxDeep enterprise style governance with broad editor support and sales-led pricing.9.4
• ValeA programmable prose linter with YAML rules, editor diagnostics, and CI workflows.9.2
• Congree Authoring ServerEnterprise authoring checks with terminology control, reusable approved text, and broad editor integrations.8.9

See all write-good alternatives →

Featured on iTechGuides

write-good is listed in our Writing Style Checkers directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/write-good/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/write-good.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update