Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

write-good review

Free#26 of 29 in Writing Style Checkers

A focused CLI and JavaScript linter for automated English-prose suggestions.

6.4/10Editor score
Visit write-good
write-good6.4 Visit write-good

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

write-good is an open-source JavaScript and command-line linter for English prose, aimed at developers who want automated writing checks in development workflows. It can operate as a Node.js module or local CLI, with checks covering passive voice, repeated words, weasel words, adverbs, wordiness, clichés, sentence openings, lexical illusions, and E-Prime usage. Its MIT License and self-hosted model suit teams that prefer a lightweight tool they can run within their own development environment.

The product’s strongest feature is the breadth of its focused prose checks without moving beyond a developer-oriented linting model. The JavaScript API returns suggestions with positions and explanations, while the CLI supports files and globs. Checks can be configured, terms can be added to a whitelist, and custom language-check extensions can expand the rule set. Optional E-Prime checking gives the tool an additional editing mode for teams that follow that style. Docker-based execution also provides another way to run it in a local workflow.

write-good is a practical choice when prose review needs to sit close to code, scripts, or documentation workflows. Its open-source distribution, CLI, API access, and self-hosted operation make it a fit for developers who want direct control over execution and configuration. The trade-off is its narrow focus: the published positioning centers on prose suggestions, while broader integrations and governance features are outside its scope. Teams seeking a lightweight linter should consider write-good; organizations needing a wider writing-quality program may prefer a product with a broader ecosystem and administrative feature set.

write-good pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • JavaScript API returns suggestions with positions and explanations
    • Checks passive voice, wordiness, clichés, weasel words, and adverbs
    • Configurable checks, whitelist support, custom extensions, and Docker execution
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on suggestions rather than enforced rule actions
    • No integrations beyond its CLI and JavaScript API
    • Lacks broader governance features for larger writing programs

write-good fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update