Best Trilio Site Recovery Alternatives in 2026
The top Trilio Site Recovery alternatives are Azure Site Recovery, Zerto and Acronis Cyber Disaster Recovery Cloud: 15 cloud disaster recovery software our editors would look at instead of Trilio Site Recovery, in our ranking order.
Trilio Site Recovery: A Kubernetes-native DR platform for KubeVirt and OpenShift Virtualization VM recovery. Where it falls short: workload coverage is limited to KubeVirt and OpenShift virtualization VMs.
Switching from Trilio Site Recovery? For most cloud disaster recovery software buyers the best Trilio Site Recovery alternative is Azure Site Recovery, built for azure-centered mixed-workload environments. Everpure Resilience has a free plan. Acronis Cyber Disaster Recovery Cloud offers the most minimum rpo (15 min).
Why People Look for a Trilio Site Recovery Alternative
- Workload coverage is limited to KubeVirt and OpenShift Virtualization VMs
- The three-cluster primary, DR, and quorum architecture adds infrastructure needs
- Pricing requires contacting sales rather than selecting a published plan
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallAzure Site Recovery9.2
Azure-centered mixed-workload environments
Visit Azure Site Recovery - Best free optionEverpure Resilience7.5
Has a free plan
Visit Everpure Resilience - Most minimum rpoAcronis Cyber Disaster Recovery Cloud8.7
15 min
Visit Acronis Cyber Disaster Recovery Cloud
All 15 Trilio Site Recovery Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forAzure-centered mixed-workload environments
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 9.2 vs 6.9
A broad hybrid recovery service for Azure-centered environments with orchestration and testing.
- Failover orchestration
9.2/10★★★★★Visit site -
Best forHybrid and multi-cloud enterprise recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.8 vs 6.9
A hybrid and multi-cloud recovery platform with deep orchestration and journal-based restores.
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Zerto -
Best forBroad server and application recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 6.9
A broad recovery service for businesses and providers managing varied workloads.
- Immutable recovery points
- Dependency mapping
- Failover orchestration
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Acronis -
Best forIT teams needing fast recovery for servers and VMs
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.6 vs 6.9
A recovery-focused platform for five-minute backups, virtualization, and cloud disaster recovery.
- Immutable recovery points
- Failover orchestration
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Datto SIRIS -
Best forVMware multi-site replication
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 6.9
A VMware-focused recovery platform for multi-site replication, testing, and orchestrated failover.
- Failover orchestration
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Dell -
Best forNetApp-based VMware and Kubernetes recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.3 vs 6.9
A NetApp-focused recovery service with orchestration, testing and flexible subscription options.
- Failover orchestration
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit NetApp -
Best forIBM Power and enterprise application recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.2 vs 6.9
A focused recovery platform for IBM Power workloads and enterprise application continuity.
- Failover orchestration
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit IBM -
Best forNutanix-centered infrastructure recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 6.9
A broad Nutanix infrastructure management plane with strong recovery workflows.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Nutanix -
Best forMixed physical, virtual, and cloud workloads
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 8.0 vs 6.9
A hybrid recovery platform for businesses and service providers managing mixed workloads.
- Failover orchestration
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Infrascale -
Best forBackup-led hybrid disaster recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 6.9
Backup-led disaster recovery with recovery validation, replication, and broad workload support.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit Arcserve -
Best forHybrid VM recovery with immutable backups
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 6.9
A hybrid recovery platform for fast VM restores, immutable backups, and recovery testing.
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Quorum -
Best forVeeam-based VMware and Hyper-V recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 7.7 vs 6.9
A Veeam-centered orchestrator for testing and executing enterprise recovery plans.
- Dependency mapping
- Failover orchestration
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit Veeam -
Best forVMware-to-cloud recovery
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 7.7 vs 6.9
A focused hybrid DR platform for agentless VMware replication and cloud recovery.
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit JetStream DR -
Best forPriced replication for mixed environments
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 7.6 vs 6.9
A paid replication platform for protecting mixed Windows and Linux server environments.
- Failover orchestration
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit Cristie -
Best forFree VMware-focused DR testing
- Better than Trilio Site Recovery:
- Editor score 7.5 vs 6.9
A free VMware-focused service for recovery testing, vaulting, and orchestrated failover.
- Failover orchestration
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit Everpure
Trilio Site Recovery Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Trilio Site Recovery?
Azure Site Recovery: #1 in our Cloud Disaster Recovery Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.2 out of 10. A broad hybrid recovery service for Azure-centered environments with orchestration and testing.
Is there a free alternative to Trilio Site Recovery?
Yes. Everpure Resilience has a free plan or a free tier.
Why do people look for Trilio Site Recovery alternatives?
Workload coverage is limited to KubeVirt and OpenShift Virtualization VMs; The three-cluster primary, DR, and quorum architecture adds infrastructure needs; Pricing requires contacting sales rather than selecting a published plan.
Which Trilio Site Recovery alternative has the most minimum rpo?
Acronis Cyber Disaster Recovery Cloud, with 15 min.
How do I switch from Trilio Site Recovery?
Snapshot or back up the data and configs on your Trilio Site Recovery server. Create the new server with the same operating system and size, and add your SSH key. Copy the data across (rsync or your backup tool) and reinstall your apps or containers. Move the DNS records or IP references to the new server, test it, then cancel Trilio Site Recovery.
How to Switch from Trilio Site Recovery
- Snapshot or back up the data and configs on your Trilio Site Recovery server.
- Create the new server with the same operating system and size, and add your SSH key.
- Copy the data across (rsync or your backup tool) and reinstall your apps or containers.
- Move the DNS records or IP references to the new server, test it, then cancel Trilio Site Recovery.
Trilio Site Recovery vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Failover orchestration | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Trilio Site Recovery | Yes | 6.9 | ||
| 1 | Azure Site Recovery | No | Yes | 9.2 | |
| 2 | Zerto | No | 8.8 | ||
| 3 | Acronis Cyber Disaster Recovery Cloud | No | Yes | 8.7 | |
| 4 | Datto SIRIS | Yes | 8.6 | ||
| 5 | Dell RecoverPoint | Yes | 8.5 | ||
| 6 | NetApp Disaster Recovery | No | Yes | 8.3 | |
| 7 | IBM VM Recovery Manager for Power | Yes | 8.2 | ||
| 8 | Nutanix Prism Central | No | 8.1 | ||
| 9 | Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery | No | Yes | 8.0 | |
| 10 | Arcserve UDP | No | 7.9 | ||
| 11 | Quorum onQ | 7.8 | |||
| 12 | Veeam Recovery Orchestrator | No | Yes | 7.7 | |
| 13 | JetStream DR | 7.7 | |||
| 14 | Cristie CloneManager | No | $500/device/yr | Yes | 7.6 |
| 15 | Everpure Resilience | Yes | Yes | 7.5 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update