Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Trigo review

Free#23 of 26 in RDF Databases

A focused, Go-based RDF store for self-hosted SPARQL workloads.

6.9/10Editor score
Trigo6.9 Visit Trigo

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Trigo is an open-source RDF triplestore and SPARQL query engine written in Go. It is designed for teams that want self-hosted RDF storage with a lightweight deployment model, or developers who prefer to embed a store through a Go library. The project can run as a standalone server and provides a web interface for interactive queries, alongside API access through its W3C SPARQL 1.1 HTTP endpoint.

Its strongest area is the core RDF and SPARQL feature set. Trigo stores RDF triples and quads, supports named graphs, and accepts Turtle, N-Triples, N-Quads, TriG, RDF/XML, and JSON-LD serialization formats. The published architecture uses BadgerDB-backed storage with an 11-index design, giving the product a defined storage approach for indexed RDF data. SPARQL 1.1 support and the HTTP endpoint make it suitable for applications that need standards-based querying rather than a basic document store.

Trigo is most appropriate when a focused, Go-based RDF component fits the application and the team is comfortable managing a self-hosted service. The standalone server, interactive web query interface, and Go integration cover several practical ways to work with the product. Its narrower scope is less suitable for teams that require a wider integration ecosystem, federation, or reasoning capabilities. Choose Trigo for direct RDF triple and quad storage with SPARQL 1.1; consider alternatives when distributed querying or broader platform coverage is central to the project.

Trigo pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports SPARQL 1.1 with a W3C HTTP endpoint
    • Stores RDF triples, quads, and named graphs
    • Runs standalone or embeds through a Go library
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure management
    • Focused ecosystem fit may not suit broader integration needs
    • Reasoning and federation are not part of its stated feature set

Trigo fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update