Best Travis CI Alternatives in 2026
The top Travis CI alternatives are GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD and TeamCity: 15 continuous integration software our editors would look at instead of Travis CI, in our ranking order.
Travis CI: A flexible CI platform for multi-repository teams that need parallel, cached builds. Where it falls short: the cheapest paid plan uses build credits rather than included build minutes.
Switching from Travis CI? For most continuous integration software buyers the best Travis CI alternative is GitHub Actions, built for gitHub-centered teams. On a budget, Bitbucket Pipelines starts at $3.65/user/mo, against $13.75/mo for Travis CI. Bitbucket Pipelines offers the most parallel jobs (600 jobs).
Why People Look for a Travis CI Alternative
- The cheapest paid plan uses build credits rather than included build minutes
- The Free Plan is limited to 20 concurrent jobs
- A free trial is currently unavailable
- Paid from $13.75/mo — Bitbucket Pipelines is $3.65/mo
- Parallel jobs: 80 jobs — up to 600 jobs with Bitbucket Pipelines
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallGitHub Actions9.4
GitHub-centered teams
Visit GitHub Actions - Lowest priceBitbucket Pipelines8.9
Paid plans from $3.65/user/mo
Visit Bitbucket Pipelines - Best free optionGitHub Actions9.4
Has a free plan
Visit GitHub Actions - Most parallel jobsBitbucket Pipelines8.9
600 jobs
Visit Bitbucket Pipelines
All 15 Travis CI Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forGitHub-centered teams
- Better than Travis CI:
- Paid from: $4/mo vs $13.75/mo
- Editor score 9.4 vs 8.2
A flexible CI/CD platform with strong GitHub integration and a low-cost entry tier.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
9.4/10★★★★★Visit GitHub Actions -
Best forIntegrated DevOps teams
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 9.3 vs 8.2
A flexible GitLab-integrated CI/CD system with strong pipeline orchestration.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
9.3/10★★★★★Visit GitLab CI/CD -
Best forJetBrains ecosystem teams
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 9.1 vs 8.2
A flexible CI/CD platform for teams working across JetBrains tools and major VCS providers.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
9.1/10★★★★★Visit TeamCity -
Best forTeams needing advanced test CI
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 9.0 vs 8.2
A flexible CI platform for teams that need broad environments and advanced test workflows.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit CircleCI -
Best forBitbucket-based teams
- Better than Travis CI:
- Paid from: $3.65/mo vs $13.75/mo
- Parallel jobs: 600 jobs vs 80 jobs
- Editor score 8.9 vs 8.2
A cost-conscious CI/CD service for teams already working in Bitbucket Cloud.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forCustomizable self-hosted CI
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 8.8 vs 8.2
A flexible self-hosted CI server for teams that want pipeline control and extensibility.
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
- Self-hosted runners
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Jenkins -
Best forHigh-scale engineering teams
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 8.2
Deep, flexible CI for high-scale teams that can justify usage-based pricing.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Buildkite -
Best forTeams wanting visual workflows and self-hosting
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 8.6 vs 8.2
A flexible CI platform for visual workflows, YAML pipelines, and self-hosted infrastructure.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Semaphore -
Best forGoogle Cloud teams needing container build automation
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 8.2
A container-focused CI service for teams deploying deeply into Google Cloud.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Google Cloud -
Best forTeams wanting AI-assisted CI
- Better than Travis CI:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 8.2
AI-assisted CI with intelligent testing, flexible execution, and a capable free plan.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Harness CI -
Best forAWS-native teams needing usage-based build execution
Usage-based CI for AWS teams that need managed builds across web, Android, and macOS.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit AWS CodeBuild -
Best forSelf-hosted container CI teams
Open-source container CI for teams that want control over their own infrastructure.
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
- Self-hosted runners
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Screwdriver -
Best forWindows-focused CI teams
A flexible CI/CD service with strong Windows support and modest entry-level parallelism.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit AppVeyor -
Best forAtlassian self-hosted environments
A capable Atlassian-centered CI/CD tool for teams running their own infrastructure.
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
- Self-hosted runners
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Atlassian -
Best forMobile teams needing device testing
A strong fit for mobile teams that need device testing and app delivery workflows.
- Hosted option
- Pull request checks
- Artifact or dependency cache
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit Bitrise
Travis CI Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Travis CI?
GitHub Actions: #1 in our Continuous Integration Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. A flexible CI/CD platform with strong GitHub integration and a low-cost entry tier.
Is there a free alternative to Travis CI?
Yes. GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, TeamCity, CircleCI and Bitbucket Pipelines have a free plan or a free tier (13 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
What is the cheapest paid alternative to Travis CI?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, Bitbucket Pipelines starts lowest, at $3.65/user/mo.
Why do people look for Travis CI alternatives?
The cheapest paid plan uses build credits rather than included build minutes; The Free Plan is limited to 20 concurrent jobs; A free trial is currently unavailable.
Which Travis CI alternative has the most parallel jobs?
Bitbucket Pipelines, with 600 jobs.
How do I switch from Travis CI?
Export your data from Travis CI (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Travis CI.
How to Switch from Travis CI
- Export your data from Travis CI (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Travis CI.
Travis CI vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Hosted option | Self-hosted runners | Parallel jobs | Pull request checks | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Travis CI | Yes | $13.75/mo | Yes | Yes | 80 jobs | Yes | 8.2 |
| 1 | GitHub Actions | Yes | $4/user/mo | Yes | Yes | 60 jobs | Yes | 9.4 |
| 2 | GitLab CI/CD | Yes | $29/user/mo | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.3 | |
| 3 | TeamCity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.1 | ||
| 4 | CircleCI | Yes | $15/mo | Yes | Yes | 80 jobs | Yes | 9.0 |
| 5 | Bitbucket Pipelines | Yes | $3.65/user/mo | Yes | Yes | 600 jobs | Yes | 8.9 |
| 6 | Jenkins | Yes | Free | No | Yes | Yes | 8.8 | |
| 7 | Buildkite | Yes | $30/user/mo | Yes | Yes | 10 jobs | Yes | 8.7 |
| 8 | Semaphore | Yes | $0.0025/unit usage-based | Yes | Yes | 20 jobs | Yes | 8.6 |
| 9 | Google Cloud Build | Yes | $0.006/unit usage-based | 8.5 | ||||
| 10 | Harness CI | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.4 | ||
| 11 | AWS CodeBuild | No | $0.003/unit usage-based | 8.1 | ||||
| 12 | Screwdriver | Yes | Free | No | Yes | Yes | 8.0 | |
| 13 | AppVeyor | Yes | $29/mo | Yes | Yes | 1 jobs | Yes | 7.9 |
| 14 | Bamboo | No | No | Yes | Yes | 7.8 | ||
| 15 | Bitrise | Yes | $89/mo | Yes | Yes | 4 jobs | Yes | 7.7 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update