This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them

Period

–Visits

–Page views

–Clicks to vendors

–Time on page

–Reading now

Clicks to vendors, by tool

Top countries

Devices

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

textlint

Free#24 of 29 in Writing Style Checkers

textlint: A flexible, open-source text linter for teams that want customizable workflows. Ranked #24 of 29 in Writing Style Checkers by our editors (6.6/10); pricing: Open source; best for developers building extensible linting workflows.

6.6/10Editor score

Visit textlint

textlint6.6 Visit textlint

At a glance

Editor score
6.6 / 10
Pricing
Open source
Best for
Developers building extensible linting workflows
Paid from
Free
Facts checked
20 Sep 2026

Where it wins
- Custom rules, presets, filters, and processors support tailored linting.
- Automatic fixes include a dry-run mode for safer file changes.
- Editor integrations, GitHub Actions, APIs, and MCP broaden its reach.
Where it doesn't
- Rules are installed separately and require textlintrc configuration.
- Markdown and plain text are supported by default; other formats need plugins.
- Built-in brand, terminology, and team-governance features are limited.

Our verdict on textlint

textlint is an open-source JavaScript utility for checking natural-language text. It runs locally through a command-line interface and supports Markdown and plain text by default. Developers can add rules, presets, filters, and processors through its plugin-based architecture, making it suited to teams building customized linting workflows rather than users seeking a fixed, ready-made checker. It supports Windows, macOS, Linux, and API-based use, with a standalone desktop app also available.

Customization is the main reason to choose textlint. Users install rules separately, configure them in a textlintrc file, and can lint files or apply automatic fixes with dry-run mode. Built-in and custom output formatters, file caching, and CLI configuration support repeatable workflows. Node.js and kernel APIs extend the tool beyond the command line, while plugins add support for HTML and other formats. That flexibility also creates setup responsibility: teams need to select and configure the rule ecosystem that matches their writing standards.

Its ecosystem covers Visual Studio Code, Atom, Sublime Text, Vim, micro, NetBeans, Emacs, GitHub Actions, Chrome extensions, and MCP. The GitHub Actions integration fits continuous checks, while the MCP server supports AI-assistant workflows. These integrations make textlint a practical choice for developers who want linting embedded in editors, automation, or custom applications. It is less suited to buyers looking for built-in brand, terminology, and team-governance features without assembling plugins and configuration. Choose textlint for extensibility and API access; consider an alternative if a narrower, more managed writing checker is the priority.

Your product? Our editors can test textlint in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

textlint pricing

Plans Open sourceFree Free to use — no paid tier required for the core job.

See plans on textlint.org

textlint fact sheet

Free plan	Not verified
Paid from	Free
Custom style guide	Not verified
Terminology management	Not verified
Brand voice rules	Not verified
Editor support	Atom, Sublime Text, Vim, Visual Studio Code, micro, NetBeans, Emacs
Rule action	Not verified
Team workflow	Not verified
API access	Yes
Deployment	Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business (editorial estimate)
Integrations	10 integrations: Visual Studio Code, Atom, Sublime Text, Vim, micro, NetBeans … See all →
Pricing	Open source
Website	textlint.org
Facts checked	20 Sep 2026

textlint integrations

textlint lists 10 integrations on its own site.

Visual Studio Code
Atom
Sublime Text
Vim
micro
NetBeans
Emacs
GitHub Actions
Chrome extensions
MCP

See all textlint integrations →

Alternatives to textlint

See all textlint alternatives →

Used textlint? Be the first to review it

The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used textlint for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.

Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Title

Your review

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Pros (optional · one per line)

Cons (optional · one per line)

Your name (shown with your review)

Role (optional)

Company (optional)

How long have you used it?

I've used textlint myself and this is my honest opinion — nobody paid or asked me to write it.

Posted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Featured on iTechGuides

textlint is listed in our Writing Style Checkers directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/textlint/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/textlint.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update