Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

textlint review

Free#24 of 29 in Writing Style Checkers

A flexible, open-source text linter for teams that want customizable workflows.

6.6/10Editor score
textlint6.6 Visit textlint

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

textlint is an open-source JavaScript utility for checking natural-language text. It runs locally through a command-line interface and supports Markdown and plain text by default. Developers can add rules, presets, filters, and processors through its plugin-based architecture, making it suited to teams building customized linting workflows rather than users seeking a fixed, ready-made checker. It supports Windows, macOS, Linux, and API-based use, with a standalone desktop app also available.

Customization is the main reason to choose textlint. Users install rules separately, configure them in a textlintrc file, and can lint files or apply automatic fixes with dry-run mode. Built-in and custom output formatters, file caching, and CLI configuration support repeatable workflows. Node.js and kernel APIs extend the tool beyond the command line, while plugins add support for HTML and other formats. That flexibility also creates setup responsibility: teams need to select and configure the rule ecosystem that matches their writing standards.

Its ecosystem covers Visual Studio Code, Atom, Sublime Text, Vim, micro, NetBeans, Emacs, GitHub Actions, Chrome extensions, and MCP. The GitHub Actions integration fits continuous checks, while the MCP server supports AI-assistant workflows. These integrations make textlint a practical choice for developers who want linting embedded in editors, automation, or custom applications. It is less suited to buyers looking for built-in brand, terminology, and team-governance features without assembling plugins and configuration. Choose textlint for extensibility and API access; consider an alternative if a narrower, more managed writing checker is the priority.

textlint pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Custom rules, presets, filters, and processors support tailored linting.
    • Automatic fixes include a dry-run mode for safer file changes.
    • Editor integrations, GitHub Actions, APIs, and MCP broaden its reach.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Rules are installed separately and require textlintrc configuration.
    • Markdown and plain text are supported by default; other formats need plugins.
    • Built-in brand, terminology, and team-governance features are limited.

textlint fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update