Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Tetragon review

An open-source choice for programmable Linux runtime monitoring and Kubernetes-aware enforcement.

7.1/10Editor score
Tetragon7.1 Visit Tetragon

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Tetragon is an open-source security observability and runtime enforcement tool from Cilium. It is designed for Linux teams that need programmable monitoring of process execution, system calls, file activity, and network activity. Kubernetes-aware policies can use namespaces, pods, and containers as workload identities, making the product a fit for teams operating containerized workloads while retaining control over enforcement in the Linux kernel.

Its standout capability is custom runtime policy design. TracingPolicy resources support kprobe, tracepoint, and uprobe hooks, while enforcement can use return-value overrides and signals. This gives security teams a way to define controls around specific kernel and application events rather than relying only on fixed detections. JSON event output and gRPC access support integration with surrounding systems, while Prometheus, Kubernetes, Helm, and Docker fit its operational ecosystem. Deployment options include Kubernetes Helm, containers, and released Linux packages.

Tetragon’s focus is narrower than a platform that covers the full software supply chain. It is suited to runtime observability, Kubernetes identity policies, and programmable enforcement, but teams seeking image scanning, registry scanning, admission control, or user-facing SBOM generation should choose a product built around those workflows instead. The open-source, self-hosted model fits organizations that want deployment control and can operate Linux infrastructure. Teams primarily looking for managed security operations or broad pre-deployment coverage should consider an alternative.

Tetragon pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Monitors processes, syscalls, files, and network activity with eBPF
    • Applies policies using Kubernetes-aware workload identities
    • Supports custom tracing with kprobes, tracepoints, and uprobes
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on runtime security rather than image or registry scanning
    • Does not provide verified admission-control workflows
    • Requires self-hosted deployment and Linux-based infrastructure

Tetragon fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update