Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Terragrunt review

Freemium#17 of 29 in Infrastructure as Code ToolsInfrastructure AutomationOrchestration / Provisioning Software

A free dependency-aware layer for teams coordinating Terraform or OpenTofu units.

7.6/10Editor score
Terragrunt7.6 Visit Terragrunt

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Terragrunt is an open-source Infrastructure as Code orchestration and configuration tool for teams using OpenTofu or Terraform. It organizes infrastructure into independently deployable units and coordinates operations across stacks. Its command-line binary runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows, with self-hosted execution supported. Teams that already work with HCL-based infrastructure configuration and want dependency-aware orchestration are the clearest fit.

The pricing model is straightforward: Terragrunt is open source and has a free plan. There are no paid tiers to compare for this product. Its value comes from the orchestration layer around existing infrastructure engines and state backends, including reusable configuration through includes and shared settings, backend and state configuration generation, resource importing, hooks, and infrastructure scaffolding. The product is distinct from Terragrunt Scale, whose commercial offerings are not part of this open-source listing.

Terragrunt fits ecosystems built around OpenTofu, Terraform, AWS S3, AWS DynamoDB, GitHub, and GitLab. Its dependency graph supports stack operations and run ordering, which makes it suited to infrastructure split into related units rather than a single undifferentiated configuration. The trade-off is operational ownership: users run Terragrunt alongside their infrastructure engines, providers, state backends, and execution environments, rather than through a separate managed control plane. Teams seeking drift detection, policy as code, or commercial CI/CD should choose a product designed around those capabilities instead.

Terragrunt pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free and open source across Linux, macOS, and Windows
    • Coordinates dependencies, stacks, and run order across infrastructure units
    • Generates backend configuration and supports reusable shared settings
  • Where it doesn't
    • Does not provide a separate managed control plane
    • Drift detection is not part of the open-source product
    • Execution and state management remain self-hosted

Terragrunt fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update