Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Tenki Code Reviewer review

Freemium#44 of 47 in AI Code Review Tools

A focused GitHub reviewer with free access and pay-per-review usage.

4.4/10Editor score
Tenki Code Reviewer4.4 Visit Tenki

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Tenki Code Reviewer is a cloud-based AI code review service for teams using GitHub. It automatically reviews pull requests, posts findings as GitHub review comments, and supports ad-hoc reviews triggered with @tenki-reviewer. Teams can install it as a GitHub App without required repository configuration changes. It is best suited to organizations that want focused review automation inside an existing GitHub workflow.

Pricing combines workspace plans with usage-based reviewer charges. The Starter plan costs $0 per month and includes monthly credits, up to 5 concurrent sessions, and up to 100 GiB of storage; code reviews draw from those credits. The Team plan costs $200 per month and includes monthly credits, up to 100 concurrent sessions, and up to 1,000 GiB of storage, with reviews also drawing from the included credits. Code Reviewer usage costs $1 per review after monthly credits are spent, with no per-seat fees. This structure suits teams that prefer usage-based review costs, while the Team plan is aimed at larger workspace capacity.

Tenki’s strongest differentiator is its focused review configuration. Repository guidance from AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md can provide context for reviews, while severity targeting ranges from low to critical and review verbosity is configurable. Findings include review status and severity in comments, giving teams a direct GitHub-based workflow. The trade-off is platform focus: Tenki supports GitHub and is available on the web, so teams working across other code hosts or seeking a broader ecosystem should consider an alternative. Choose Tenki for straightforward GitHub reviews with flexible review triggers; skip it if multi-host coverage is essential.

Tenki Code Reviewer pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Automatic and ad-hoc GitHub pull request reviews
    • Repository context from AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md
    • Severity targeting and configurable review verbosity
  • Where it doesn't
    • Supports GitHub rather than multiple code-hosting platforms
    • Code reviews use credits before usage billing applies
    • Verified feature set is narrower than broader review platforms

Tenki Code Reviewer fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update