S

Supavisor

Free#14 of 31 in Database Proxy Software

Supavisor: Open-source PostgreSQL pooling with multi-tenancy, routing, metrics, and cluster resilience. Ranked #14 of 31 in Database Proxy Software by our editors (7.8/10); pricing: Open source; best for multi-tenant PostgreSQL pooling.

7.8/10★★★★☆Editor score

Visit Supavisor

At a glance

• Editor score
  7.8 / 10
• Pricing
  Open source
• Best for
  Multi-tenant PostgreSQL pooling
• Paid from
  Free
• Deployment model
  Both
• Founded
  2020
• Facts checked
  20 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • Supports transaction, session, and native pool modes
  • Routes queries across primary and replica servers
  • Adds metrics, APIs, buffering, and cluster resilience

• Where it doesn't

  • Supports PostgreSQL rather than multiple database engines
  • Automatic failover is not listed
  • Deployment coverage centers on self-hosted environments

Our verdict on Supavisor

Supavisor is an open-source, cloud-native connection pooler for PostgreSQL, maintained by Supabase Inc. It is aimed at applications that need connection pooling under high concurrency, particularly multi-tenant deployments. The product supports transaction, session, and native pool modes, giving teams different approaches to managing database connections. It can be deployed with self-hosted Supabase or used through Supabase-managed projects, while its documented database scope remains PostgreSQL.

Its feature depth extends beyond basic pooling. Supavisor supports multi-tenant database proxying, query load balancing across primary and replica servers, named prepared statements, and query cancellation. Prometheus metrics provide an endpoint for monitoring, while OpenAPI and Swagger UI endpoints support API-oriented administration and integration. These capabilities make it a strong fit for teams that need a PostgreSQL proxy with routing and operational interfaces rather than a connection pool limited to one pooling mode.

Resilience is focused on keeping the proxy layer available during infrastructure events. Cluster-based resilience addresses Supavisor node outages, and connection buffering is documented for database restarts or failovers. That distinction matters: backend primary-election failover is described as future work, so Supavisor should not be selected when automatic database failover is a required capability. Teams working exclusively with PostgreSQL and comfortable with self-hosted deployment or the Supabase ecosystem should find the feature set well aligned. Organizations needing broad database-engine support or a proxy with documented automatic failover should consider alternatives.

Your product? Our editors can test Supavisor in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

Supavisor pricing

Supavisor fact sheet

Alternatives to Supavisor

• Heimdall Database ProxyA broad database proxy with pooling, routing, analytics, security, and failover.9.4
• ProxySQLA free, open-source proxy for routing, pooling, balancing, and managing database traffic.9.2
• ShardingSphere-ProxyA self-hosted proxy for routing, scaling, and high availability across four database protocols.9.0

See all Supavisor alternatives →

Used Supavisor? Be the first to review it

The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used Supavisor for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.

Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Website

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Your rating

5 stars★4 stars★3 stars★2 stars★1 star★

Title

Your review

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Pros (optional · one per line)

Cons (optional · one per line)

Your name (shown with your review)

Role (optional)

Company (optional)

How long have you used it?Prefer not to sayLess than a month1–6 months6–12 months1–2 years2+ years

I've used Supavisor myself and this is my honest opinion — nobody paid or asked me to write it.

Send my reviewPosted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Featured on iTechGuides

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update