Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

SeaweedFS review

A flexible open-source storage system for teams that need S3 and file access.

8.6/10Editor score
SeaweedFS8.6 Visit SeaweedFS

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

SeaweedFS is a self-hosted distributed storage system for teams that need object, file, and data-lake access in one deployment. It provides an S3-compatible object storage API, POSIX and FUSE access, HDFS compatibility, WebDAV, and Iceberg table support. Its open-source model and support for Linux, macOS, Windows, APIs, and self-hosted environments make it a fit for development teams, infrastructure operators, and organizations managing large file counts across volume servers.

The pricing structure separates development from production use. The Free plan supports development and testing under 25 TB with no license required. The Monthly plan costs $2 per TB per month and includes pay-as-you-go billing, flexible capacity, and cancellation at any time. The Yearly plan costs $20 per TB per year and provides annual billing. At 5 PB and above, the Enterprise plan uses custom volume pricing, volume discounts, and custom contracts and invoicing. Production deployments require a paid license, with Enterprise adding data recovery, self-healing storage, customizable erasure coding, operational controls, and support for production deployments.

Its strongest distinction is breadth across storage and data workflows. Teams can combine object versioning, S3 lifecycle rules, Object Lock with retention and legal hold, active-active or active-passive cluster replication, volume-level replication, erasure coding, and server-side encryption options including SSE-S3, SSE-KMS, and SSE-C. Integrations include AWS SDKs and CLI, rclone, restic, Spark, Trino, Dremio, DuckDB, Kubernetes, and several key-management systems. Choose SeaweedFS when self-hosting and multiple access models matter; choose an alternative if you want a fully managed object-storage service or a free production deployment.

SeaweedFS pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • S3-compatible API plus POSIX and FUSE file access
    • Versioning, lifecycle rules, Object Lock, and replication
    • Kubernetes support with Helm and CSI integration
  • Where it doesn't
    • Free use is limited to development and testing under 25 TB
    • Production deployments require a paid license
    • Enterprise pricing is custom for 5 PB and above

SeaweedFS fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update