Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

RubyCritic review

Free#14 of 21 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools

Combines Reek, Flay, and Flog into configurable reports for Ruby projects.

7.2/10Editor score
RubyCritic7.2 Visit RubyCritic

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

RubyCritic is a free, open-source Ruby gem for developers who want a combined view of code quality in Ruby projects. It analyzes source files or directories and aggregates results from Reek, Flay, and Flog, with project- and file-level summaries of detected code smells. It can be run from the command line or through Rake, making it relevant to individual developers as well as teams that include analysis in a CI workflow.

Its reporting options are a central strength: results can be emitted as HTML, JSON, console output, or lint reports, and custom report formatters are supported. A `.rubycritic.yml` file provides configuration, while CI mode and comparisons against prior revisions help teams inspect changes. RubyCritic supports Git, Mercurial, and Perforce for revision comparisons, and it also integrates with Guard and Jenkins CI. This combination suits Ruby projects that want several code-smell perspectives in a single reporting workflow, rather than a hosted dashboard or a broader static-analysis suite.

RubyCritic is self-hosted and free, with community and documentation support. Its focus is intentionally narrower than tools that cover security analysis or type checking: it reports code quality and smells, and does not document automated fixes. Teams looking for those capabilities should consider a different tool alongside or instead of RubyCritic. For Ruby developers who can run a local gem and want configurable, multi-format analysis in local or CI workflows, it is a practical fit; those needing hosted service management or broader analysis coverage should look elsewhere.

RubyCritic pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines Reek, Flay, and Flog analysis in one workflow
    • Outputs HTML, JSON, console, and lint reports
    • Supports CI mode, branch comparisons, and Rake integration
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on code quality and smells, not security analysis or type checking
    • Does not document automated fixes
    • Requires local installation and operation; no hosted option

RubyCritic fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update