This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them

Period

–Visits

–Page views

–Clicks to vendors

–Time on page

–Reading now

Clicks to vendors, by tool

Top countries

Devices

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

NanoMQ

Free#25 of 39 in Message Broker Software

NanoMQ: An open-source, self-hosted broker for MQTT and connected edge protocols. Ranked #25 of 39 in Message Broker Software by our editors (6.8/10); pricing: Open source; best for lightweight multi-protocol MQTT.

6.8/10Editor score

Visit NanoMQ

NanoMQ6.8 Visit NanoMQ

At a glance

Editor score
6.8 / 10
Pricing
Open source
Best for
Lightweight multi-protocol MQTT
Paid from
Free
Deployment model
Self_hosted
Founded
2021
Facts checked
20 Sep 2026

Where it wins
- Supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5.0 across TCP, TLS, and QUIC
- Adds persistence, SQLite, SQL rules, HTTP APIs, and WebSockets
- Connects MQTT with ZeroMQ, SOME/IP, DDS, NNG, and nanomsg
Where it doesn't
- Self-hosted deployment requires the team to manage its runtime environment
- Its focus is narrower than broader message broker platforms
- Commercial packaging extends separately through the MQTT Stream add-on

Our verdict on NanoMQ

NanoMQ is an open-source MQTT message broker aimed at IoT edge computing and lightweight, self-hosted deployments. It supports MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1, and 5.0, with deployment options that include Linux, Windows, Docker, and source installation. The product is suited to teams that need an MQTT-centered broker with local persistence, rule processing, WebSocket access, and management or messaging APIs rather than a broad hosted service experience.

Its main strength is protocol and integration flexibility around MQTT. NanoMQ supports MQTT over TCP, TLS, and QUIC bridging, while gateways connect MQTT environments with ZeroMQ, SOME/IP, DDS, NNG, and nanomsg. HTTP APIs provide broker management and messaging access, and the SQL-based rule engine adds a way to process messages within the broker. Built-in persistence and SQLite support also fit edge scenarios where messages need local storage. TLS/SSL security support is included for protected connections.

NanoMQ’s trade-off is its deliberate scope. The product is self-hosted, so deployment, runtime management, and operational responsibility remain with the adopting team. Its lightweight MQTT orientation may suit focused edge workloads, but organizations seeking a wider integration portfolio or a fully managed broker should compare alternatives. The open-source model keeps the core product accessible, while MQTT Stream is positioned as a separate commercial add-on. Choose NanoMQ when MQTT interoperability, edge deployment, and protocol gateways are priorities; look elsewhere when managed delivery or broader commercial packaging matters more.

Your product? Our editors can test NanoMQ in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

NanoMQ pricing

Plans Open sourceFree Free to use — no paid tier required for the core job.

See plans on nanomq.io

NanoMQ fact sheet

Free plan	Not verified
Paid from	Free
Deployment model	Self_hosted
Delivery guarantees	Configurable
Dead-letter queues	Not verified
Ordering guarantees	Not verified
Maximum message size	Not verified
Supported protocols	MQTT, ZeroMQ, nanomsg, NNG, WebSocket, SOME/IP, DDS, MQTT over QUIC
Deployment	Self-hosted
Platforms	Windows, Linux
Support	Docs
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise (editorial estimate)
Pricing	Open source
Website	nanomq.io
Facts checked	20 Sep 2026

Alternatives to NanoMQ

See all NanoMQ alternatives →

Used NanoMQ? Be the first to review it

The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used NanoMQ for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.

Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Title

Your review

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Pros (optional · one per line)

Cons (optional · one per line)

Your name (shown with your review)

Role (optional)

Company (optional)

How long have you used it?

I've used NanoMQ myself and this is my honest opinion — nobody paid or asked me to write it.

Posted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Featured on iTechGuides

NanoMQ is listed in our Message Broker Software directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/nanomq/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/nanomq.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update