Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

MTK Attribution review

#27 of 38 in Marketing Attribution SoftwareConversion Tracking

A practical agency-focused tag for capturing attribution across multiple client websites.

6.5/10Editor score
MTK Attribution6.5 Try MTK Attribution

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

MTK Attribution is a web-based marketing attribution tag for agencies managing lead data across client websites. It records first-touch, last-touch, paid-touch, and multi-session journey information, then delivers those values through website forms and data layers. Agencies can send the captured fields to HubSpot, Salesforce, or GoHighLevel, while configurable mappings, source formatting, time zones, and session rules help align the data with each client’s setup.

Pricing is structured around the number of sites managed. The Single site plan costs $29 per site per month and includes a multi-touch attribution tag and per-client dashboard. The Up to 30 sites plan costs $299 per month, while Up to 50 sites costs $399 per month; both include the same listed highlights. The published plans show monthly billing, and each new plan starts with a free trial. This structure suits agencies that need one dashboard and license arrangement across a defined client portfolio, though the cost scales with site coverage.

Its strongest fit is an agency workflow spanning common web and form platforms, including Google Tag Manager, Webflow, Wix, Squarespace, Elementor, Jotform, Gravity Forms, Framer, and Zoho Forms. Google offline import and Meta Conversions API payload support extend the captured data into advertising workflows. The main trade-off is scope: the product centers on multi-touch attribution rather than a broader set of attribution models, and browser-dependent retention affects journey data. Safari may remove local journey data after seven days without a site click. Agencies needing straightforward multi-touch capture across many sites should consider MTK Attribution; teams seeking broader modeling or less constrained retention should choose another tool.

MTK Attribution pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Tracks first-, last-, paid-, and multi-session touchpoints
    • Works with major CRMs, form tools, and website platforms
    • Offers plans for one, 30, or 50 client sites
  • Where it doesn't
    • Uses one license per client site
    • Attribution modeling is limited to multi-touch
    • Browser-dependent retention can affect stored journey data

MTK Attribution fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update