MotionMark

At a glance

• Editor score
  3.9 / 10
• Pricing
  Open source
• Best for
  Browser graphics rendering analysis
• Paid from
  Free
• Workload areas
  CSS, SVG, Canvas, HTML text rendering, image operations
• Founded
  2016
• Facts checked
  22 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • Covers CSS, SVG, Canvas, text, image, and related graphics workloads
  • Adjusts scene complexity and supports configurable test controls
  • Provides graphs, JSON results, and local result comparison

• Where it doesn't

  • Measures browser graphics rather than broad PC performance
  • Results can vary with display refresh rate and browser behavior
  • Web-only workflow may not suit installed benchmarking needs

Our verdict on MotionMark

MotionMark is an open-source, web-based benchmark for measuring browser graphics rendering performance. It is intended for browser engineers, web-platform developers, and teams comparing how browsers handle animated scenes across devices. Workloads cover CSS, SVG, Canvas, HTML text rendering, image operations, and related graphics techniques. The benchmark reports individual test scores and an overall geometric-mean score, making it a focused option for browser graphics analysis rather than a general PC benchmarking suite.

Its strongest feature is configurable workload depth. MotionMark adapts scene complexity according to measured frame rates, then presents time and complexity graphs to show how rendering performance changes. Users can choose small, medium, and large display profiles, configure warm-up and test duration, and set a target frame rate and controller. Custom test profiles and CLI automation add flexibility for repeatable evaluation, while JSON result display and local result loading support comparisons across runs. The web format also allows testing across browsers on a wide variety of devices without treating the product like a conventional installed desktop application.

The main limitation is its narrow scope. MotionMark evaluates browser behavior and graphics workloads, so it should not be the only choice for CPU, storage, memory, gaming, or whole-system PC comparisons. Results also depend on display refresh rate and browser behavior; a 60 Hz refresh rate is advised for cross-browser comparisons. Teams that need detailed browser rendering analysis should pick MotionMark, particularly when configurable scenes and machine-readable results matter. Buyers seeking a broad PC benchmark or an installed application should choose a more comprehensive alternative instead.

Your product? Our editors can test MotionMark in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

MotionMark pricing

MotionMark fact sheet

Alternatives to MotionMark

• GGeekbenchA broad benchmark suite for comparing CPU and GPU performance across five platforms.9.3
• PassMark PerformanceTestA broad benchmark suite with free standard tests and a $39 one-time advanced tier.9.1
• 3DMarkA broad benchmark suite for comparing GPU, CPU, storage, and gaming performance.9.1

See all MotionMark alternatives →

Featured on iTechGuides

MotionMark is listed in our PC Benchmark Software directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/motionmark/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/motionmark.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update