Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

LuxMark review

Free#6 of 72 in PC Benchmark Software

A free, flexible rendering benchmark for comparing GPU, CPU, and hybrid performance.

8.6/10Editor score
LuxMark8.6 Visit LuxMark

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

LuxMark is an open-source PC benchmark based on LuxCoreRender and the LuxCore API. It is designed for comparing rendering performance across OpenCL GPU, CPU, hybrid GPU+CPU, native CPU, CUDA, and OptiX/RTX workloads. Benchmark scenes include Food, HallBench, and Wallpaper, while the published workload coverage also includes path tracing and stress testing. It suits individuals, small teams, mid-market organizations, and enterprises that need a desktop tool for rendering-focused hardware comparisons across Windows, macOS, and Linux.

The software is free and open source, so its value is centered on accessible benchmarking rather than paid plan differences. Its scope spans several rendering paths: brute-force path tracing, global-illumination-cache path tracing, and bidirectional path tracing with a Metropolis sampler. Users can select devices and configure custom modes, while command-line single-run execution supports repeatable workflows. Rendered-image and scene-source validation add a way to check benchmark outputs, and a denoised preview uses Intel OpenImageDenoise. Official binaries and source code are available for Windows and Linux, while the wider LuxCoreRender project supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.

LuxMark is strongest when the comparison depends on rendering behavior, especially across different device types or rendering implementations. Hardware stress-test modes broaden its role beyond a single score, and the range of workloads makes it useful for examining GPU, CPU, and hybrid configurations. It is less suitable for buyers seeking a general PC benchmark covering unrelated components or everyday application performance. Choose it for free, rendering-specific comparisons with configurable and command-line options; choose another category of tool when the evaluation needs broader system coverage.

LuxMark pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports GPU, CPU, hybrid, CUDA, and OptiX/RTX workloads
    • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux
    • Offers custom modes, stress tests, validation, and CLI execution
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focuses on rendering rather than broad PC benchmarking
    • Advanced workloads may require benchmark configuration
    • Community and documentation are the listed support channels

LuxMark fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update